CVE-2024-27065

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-05-01. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2024-24327 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-4x9h-c32v-68jj (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates

Restore skipping transaction if table update does not modify flags.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
18th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-03). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 1, 2024

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Advisory Details (9)

Auto-updated May 12, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2531f907d3e40a6173090f10670ae76d117ab27b
Web page

netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fcf32a5bfcb8a57ac0ce717fcfa4d688c91f1005
Web page

netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/df257c435e51651c43b86326d112ddadda76350e
Web page

netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9683cb6c2c6c0f45537bf0b8868b5d38fcb63fc7
Web page

netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/845083249d6a392f3a88804e1669bdb936ee129f
Web page

netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/640dbf688ba955e83e03de84fbdda8e570b7cce4
Web page

netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d37f12707ee965d338028732575f0b85f6d9e4f
Web page

netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a0e7f2decbf9bd72461226f1f5f7dcc4b08f139
Web page

netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3443e57654f90c9a843ab6a6040c10709fd033aa

Patches & affected packages

Patch, fixed-version, affected-package, CWE and exploit details are temporarily unavailable — they could not be loaded just now. That is not a sign that none exist; please retry shortly.

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-27065?
CVE-2024-27065 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 1, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates Restore skipping transaction if table update does not modify flags.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-27065 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-27065 was published on May 1, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-27065 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-27065 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (18th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-27065?
CVE-2024-27065 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-27065?
A fix for CVE-2024-27065 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-27065 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-27065

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-27065?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.