CVE-2024-26976

HIGHNVD 7.07.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-05-01. NVD baseline CVSS 7.0; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 7.0Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: Always flush async #PF workqueue when vCPU is being destroyed

Always flush the per-vCPU async #PF workqueue when a vCPU is clearing its completion queue, e.g. when a VM and all its vCPUs is being destroyed. KVM must ensure that none of its workqueue callbacks is running when the last reference to the KVM _module_ is put. Gifting a reference to the associated VM prevents the workqueue callback from dereferencing freed vCPU/VM memory, but does not prevent the KVM module from being unloaded before the callback completes.

Drop the misguided VM refcount gifting, as calling kvm_put_kvm() from async_pf_execute() if kvm_put_kvm() flushes the async #PF workqueue will result in deadlock. async_pf_execute() can't return until kvm_put_kvm() finishes, and kvm_put_kvm() can't return until async_pf_execute() finishes:

WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 251 at virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1435 kvm_put_kvm+0x2d/0x320 [kvm] Modules linked in: vhost_net vhost vhost_iotlb tap kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 8 PID: 251 Comm: kworker/8:1 Tainted: G W 6.6.0-rc1-e7af8d17224a-x86/gmem-vm #119 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Workqueue: events async_pf_execute [kvm] RIP: 0010:kvm_put_kvm+0x2d/0x320 [kvm] Call Trace: async_pf_execute+0x198/0x260 [kvm] process_one_work+0x145/0x2d0 worker_thread+0x27e/0x3a0 kthread+0xba/0xe0 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- INFO: task kworker/8:1:251 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Tainted: G W 6.6.0-rc1-e7af8d17224a-x86/gmem-vm #119 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/8:1 state:D stack:0 pid:251 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events async_pf_execute [kvm] Call Trace: __schedule+0x33f/0xa40 schedule+0x53/0xc0 schedule_timeout+0x12a/0x140 __wait_for_common+0x8d/0x1d0 __flush_work.isra.0+0x19f/0x2c0 kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue+0x129/0x190 [kvm] kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x78/0x1b0 [kvm] kvm_put_kvm+0x1c1/0x320 [kvm] async_pf_execute+0x198/0x260 [kvm] process_one_work+0x145/0x2d0 worker_thread+0x27e/0x3a0 kthread+0xba/0xe0 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20

If kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue() actually flushes the workqueue, then there's no need to gift async_pf_execute() a reference because all invocations of async_pf_execute() will be forced to complete before the vCPU and its VM are destroyed/freed. And that in turn fixes the module unloading bug as __fput() won't do module_put() on the last vCPU reference until the vCPU has been freed, e.g. if closing the vCPU file also puts the last reference to the KVM module.

Note that kvm_check_async_pf_completion() may also take the work item off the completion queue and so also needs to flush the work queue, as the work will not be seen by kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue(). Waiting on the workqueue could theoretically delay a vCPU due to waiting for the work to complete, but that's a very, very small chance, and likely a very small delay. kvm_arch_async_page_present_queued() unconditionally makes a new request, i.e. will effectively delay entering the guest, so the remaining work is really just:

trace_kvm_async_pf_completed(addr, cr2_or_gpa);

__kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);

mmput(mm);

and mmput() can't drop the last reference to the page tables if the vCPU is still alive, i.e. the vCPU won't get stuck tearing down page tables.

Add a helper to do the flushing, specifically to deal with "wakeup all" work items, as they aren't actually work items, i.e. are never placed in a workqueue. Trying to flush a bogus workqueue entry rightly makes __flush_work() complain (kudos to whoever added that sanity check).

Note, commit 5f6de5cbebee ("KVM: Prevent module exit until al ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.0
EG Score
7.0HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
32
EG Risk 32/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity70% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
17th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.0 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-20). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 1, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (9)

Auto-updated Aug 5, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

KVM: Always flush async #PF workqueue when vCPU is being destroyed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3d75b8aa5c29058a512db29da7cbee8052724157
Web page

KVM: Always flush async #PF workqueue when vCPU is being destroyed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/caa9af2e27c275e089d702cfbaaece3b42bca31b
Web page

KVM: Always flush async #PF workqueue when vCPU is being destroyed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4f3a3bce428fb439c66a578adc447afce7b4a750
Web page

KVM: Always flush async #PF workqueue when vCPU is being destroyed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a75afe480d4349c524d9c659b1a5a544dbc39a98
Web page

KVM: Always flush async #PF workqueue when vCPU is being destroyed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b54478d20375874aeee257744dedfd3e413432ff
Web page

KVM: Always flush async #PF workqueue when vCPU is being destroyed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83d3c5e309611ef593e2fcb78444fc8ceedf9bac
Web page

KVM: Always flush async #PF workqueue when vCPU is being destroyed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f8730d6335e5f43d09151fca1f0f41922209a264
Web page

KVM: Always flush async #PF workqueue when vCPU is being destroyed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/82e25cc1c2e93c3023da98be282322fc08b61ffb
Web page

KVM: Always flush async #PF workqueue when vCPU is being destroyed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab2c2f5d9576112ad22cfd3798071cb74693b1f5

Patch Availability(23)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-gke (6.8.0-1004.7) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.4.0-1047 (5.4.0-1047.51) @ focal2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.116.106) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-iot (5.4.0.1040.38) @ focal2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.116.116) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-18.04-edge (5.4.0.189.209~18.04.1) @ bionic2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (5.15.0.1065.73~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-host (5.15.0-1035.39) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp (6.8.0-1008.9) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-18.04-edge (5.4.0.189.187) @ focal2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04a (6.8.0-1006.6+1) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-nolpae (5.15.0.1058.56) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1065.65) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi2-hwe-18.04-edge (5.4.0.1112.142) @ focal2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-edge (5.15.0.1065.71~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.8.0-35.35) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1068.66) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-64k (6.8.0-1006.6) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-427.62.1.el9_42025-04-02redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-503.11.1.el9_52024-11-12redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.27.1.el8_102024-11-05redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.27.1.rt7.368.el8_102024-11-05redhat
linuxKernel @ 4.19.312 (fixes >=2.6.38)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:10(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux4.19.118-1 ... 4.19.98-1~bpo9+1 (46 versions)
  • every version up to 4.19.316-1: fixed in 4.19.316-1
—
linux-5.105.10.136-1~deb10u1 ... 5.10.209-2~deb10u1 (13 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.216-1~deb10u1: fixed in 5.10.216-1~deb10u1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (39 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.216-1: fixed in 5.10.216-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.27-1 ... 6.1.82-1 (19 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.85-1: fixed in 6.1.85-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.7.12-1: fixed in 6.7.12-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.7.12-1: fixed in 6.7.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(18)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 96 of 201 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 105 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  2. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  4. 2026-10-20 20:18 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-20 20:18 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-20 20:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qc4m-rx2p-hrfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  7. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  8. 2026-10-19 20:25 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  10. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  11. 2026-10-18 07:22 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  13. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  14. 2026-10-15 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  15. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  16. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  17. 2026-10-12 17:59 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  19. 2026-10-11 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  22. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  23. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  24. 2026-10-08 17:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  25. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  2. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  3. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  4. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  5. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  6. 2026-09-30 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  8. 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  9. 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  10. 2026-09-27 01:12 UTCOSV refresh
  11. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  12. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  13. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  14. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  15. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  16. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  17. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  18. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  19. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  20. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  21. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  22. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  23. 2026-09-07 10:48 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  25. 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  26. 2026-09-04 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  27. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  28. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  29. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  30. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  31. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  32. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  33. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  34. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  35. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  36. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  37. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  38. 2026-08-20 19:31 UTCOSV refresh
  39. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  40. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  41. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  42. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  43. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  44. 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  45. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  46. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  47. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  48. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  49. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  50. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  51. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  52. 2026-08-05 12:18 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-05 12:18 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-05 12:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qc4m-rx2p-hrfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  55. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  56. 2026-08-04 12:15 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-04 12:15 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-04 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qc4m-rx2p-hrfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  59. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  60. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  61. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  62. 2026-08-01 06:06 UTCOSV refresh
  63. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  64. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  65. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  66. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  67. 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  68. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  69. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  70. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  71. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-26976?
CVE-2024-26976 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 1, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: Always flush async #PF workqueue when vCPU is being destroyed Always flush the per-vCPU async #PF workqueue when a vCPU is clearing its completion queue, e.g. when a VM and all its vCPUs is being destroyed. KVM must ensure…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-26976 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-26976 was published on May 1, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-26976 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-26976 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (17th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-26976?
CVE-2024-26976 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.0 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-26976?
A fix for CVE-2024-26976 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-26976 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-26976

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-26976?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.