In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fbdev: udlfb: Fix endpoint check
The syzbot fuzzer detected a problem in the udlfb driver, caused by an
endpoint not having the expected type:
usb 1-1: Read EDID byte 0 failed: -71
usb 1-1: Unable to get valid EDID from device/display
------------[ cut here ]------------
usb 1-1: BOGUS urb xfer, pipe 3 != type 1
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:504 usb_submit_urb+0xed6/0x1880
drivers/usb/core/urb.c:504
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted
6.4.0-rc1-syzkaller-00016-ga4422ff22142 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google
04/28/2023
Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event
RIP: 0010:usb_submit_urb+0xed6/0x1880 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:504
...
Call Trace:
dlfb_submit_urb+0x92/0x180 drivers/video/fbdev/udlfb.c:1980
dlfb_set_video_mode+0x21f0/0x2950 drivers/video/fbdev/udlfb.c:315
dlfb_ops_set_par+0x2a7/0x8d0 drivers/video/fbdev/udlfb.c:1111
dlfb_usb_probe+0x149a/0x2710 drivers/video/fbdev/udlfb.c:1743
The current approach for this issue failed to catch the problem
because it only checks for the existence of a bulk-OUT endpoint; it
doesn't check whether this endpoint is the one that the driver will
actually use.
We can fix the problem by instead checking that the endpoint used by
the driver does exist and is bulk-OUT.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-26). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it