In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: xsk: Fix invalid buffer access for legacy rq
The below crash can be encountered when using xdpsock in rx mode for
legacy rq: the buffer gets released in the XDP_REDIRECT path, and then
once again in the driver. This fix sets the flag to avoid releasing on
the driver side.
XSK handling of buffers for legacy rq was relying on the caller to set
the skip release flag. But the referenced fix started using fragment
counts for pages instead of the skip flag.
Crash log:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xffff8881217e3a: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU: 0 PID: 14 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1+ #31
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_03b13f331978c78c+0xf/0x28
Code: ...
RSP: 0018:ffff88810082fc98 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888138404901 RCX: c0ffffc900027cbc
RDX: ffffffffa000b514 RSI: 00ffff8881217e32 RDI: ffff888138404901
RBP: ffff88810082fc98 R08: 0000000000091100 R09: 0000000000000006
R10: 0000000000000800 R11: 0000000000000800 R12: ffffc9000027a000
R13: ffff8881217e2dc0 R14: ffff8881217e2910 R15: ffff8881217e2f00
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88852c800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000564cb2e2cde0 CR3: 000000010e603004 CR4: 0000000000370eb0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
? die_addr+0x32/0x80
? exc_general_protection+0x192/0x390
? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x30
? 0xffffffffa000b514
? bpf_prog_03b13f331978c78c+0xf/0x28
mlx5e_xdp_handle+0x48/0x670 [mlx5_core]
? dev_gro_receive+0x3b5/0x6e0
mlx5e_xsk_skb_from_cqe_linear+0x6e/0x90 [mlx5_core]
mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe+0x55/0x100 [mlx5_core]
mlx5e_poll_rx_cq+0x87/0x6e0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5e_napi_poll+0x45e/0x6b0 [mlx5_core]
__napi_poll+0x25/0x1a0
net_rx_action+0x28a/0x300
__do_softirq+0xcd/0x279
? sort_range+0x20/0x20
run_ksoftirqd+0x1a/0x20
smpboot_thread_fn+0xa2/0x130
kthread+0xc9/0xf0
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
Modules linked in: mlx5_ib mlx5_core rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ib_umad rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm ib_uverbs ib_core xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xt_addrtype iptable_nat nf_nat br_netfilter overlay zram zsmalloc fuse [last unloaded: mlx5_core]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-05). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fixed version is listed under Patch Availability. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it