In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
binder: fix UAF of alloc->vma in race with munmap()
[ cmllamas: clean forward port from commit 015ac18be7de ("binder: fix
UAF of alloc->vma in race with munmap()") in 5.10 stable. It is needed
in mainline after the revert of commit a43cfc87caaf ("android: binder:
stop saving a pointer to the VMA") as pointed out by Liam. The commit
log and tags have been tweaked to reflect this. ]
In commit 720c24192404 ("ANDROID: binder: change down_write to
down_read") binder assumed the mmap read lock is sufficient to protect
alloc->vma inside binder_update_page_range(). This used to be accurate
until commit dd2283f2605e ("mm: mmap: zap pages with read mmap_sem in
munmap"), which now downgrades the mmap_lock after detaching the vma
from the rbtree in munmap(). Then it proceeds to teardown and free the
vma with only the read lock held.
This means that accesses to alloc->vma in binder_update_page_range() now
will race with vm_area_free() in munmap() and can cause a UAF as shown
in the following KASAN trace:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in vm_insert_page+0x7c/0x1f0
Read of size 8 at addr ffff16204ad00600 by task server/558
CPU: 3 PID: 558 Comm: server Not tainted 5.10.150-00001-gdc8dcf942daa #1
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x2a0
show_stack+0x18/0x2c
dump_stack+0xf8/0x164
print_address_description.constprop.0+0x9c/0x538
kasan_report+0x120/0x200
__asan_load8+0xa0/0xc4
vm_insert_page+0x7c/0x1f0
binder_update_page_range+0x278/0x50c
binder_alloc_new_buf+0x3f0/0xba0
binder_transaction+0x64c/0x3040
binder_thread_write+0x924/0x2020
binder_ioctl+0x1610/0x2e5c
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd4/0x120
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xac/0x270
do_el0_svc+0x38/0xa0
el0_svc+0x1c/0x2c
el0_sync_handler+0xe8/0x114
el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
Allocated by task 559:
kasan_save_stack+0x38/0x6c
__kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xe4/0xf0
kasan_slab_alloc+0x18/0x2c
kmem_cache_alloc+0x1b0/0x2d0
vm_area_alloc+0x28/0x94
mmap_region+0x378/0x920
do_mmap+0x3f0/0x600
vm_mmap_pgoff+0x150/0x17c
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x284/0x2dc
__arm64_sys_mmap+0x84/0xa4
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xac/0x270
do_el0_svc+0x38/0xa0
el0_svc+0x1c/0x2c
el0_sync_handler+0xe8/0x114
el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
Freed by task 560:
kasan_save_stack+0x38/0x6c
kasan_set_track+0x28/0x40
kasan_set_free_info+0x24/0x4c
__kasan_slab_free+0x100/0x164
kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x20
kmem_cache_free+0xc4/0x34c
vm_area_free+0x1c/0x2c
remove_vma+0x7c/0x94
__do_munmap+0x358/0x710
__vm_munmap+0xbc/0x130
__arm64_sys_munmap+0x4c/0x64
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xac/0x270
do_el0_svc+0x38/0xa0
el0_svc+0x1c/0x2c
el0_sync_handler+0xe8/0x114
el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
[...]
==================================================================
To prevent the race above, revert back to taking the mmap write lock
inside binder_update_page_range(). One might expect an increase of mmap
lock contention. However, binder already serializes these calls via top
level alloc->mutex. Also, there was no performance impact shown when
running the binder benchmark tests.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-03). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it