CVE-2023-53778

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-12-09. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

accel/qaic: Clean up integer overflow checking in map_user_pages()

The encode_dma() function has some validation on in_trans->size but it would be more clear to move those checks to find_and_map_user_pages().

The encode_dma() had two checks:

if (in_trans->addr + in_trans->size < in_trans->addr || !in_trans->size) return -EINVAL;

The in_trans->addr variable is the starting address. The in_trans->size variable is the total size of the transfer. The transfer can occur in parts and the resources->xferred_dma_size tracks how many bytes we have already transferred.

This patch introduces a new variable "remaining" which represents the amount we want to transfer (in_trans->size) minus the amount we have already transferred (resources->xferred_dma_size).

I have modified the check for if in_trans->size is zero to instead check if in_trans->size is less than resources->xferred_dma_size. If we have already transferred more bytes than in_trans->size then there are negative bytes remaining which doesn't make sense. If there are zero bytes remaining to be copied, just return success.

The check in encode_dma() checked that "addr + size" could not overflow and barring a driver bug that should work, but it's easier to check if we do this in parts. First check that "in_trans->addr + resources->xferred_dma_size" is safe. Then check that "xfer_start_addr + remaining" is safe.

My final concern was that we are dealing with u64 values but on 32bit systems the kmalloc() function will truncate the sizes to 32 bits. So I calculated "total = in_trans->size + offset_in_page(xfer_start_addr);" and returned -EINVAL if it were >= SIZE_MAX. This will not affect 64bit systems.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 9, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 5, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

accel/qaic: Clean up integer overflow checking in map_user_pages() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96d3c1cadedb6ae2e8965e19cd12caa244afbd9c
generic

accel/qaic: Clean up integer overflow checking in map_user_pages() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d410a96e5cb8c1ec7049c83f2edcd8bbfaf5d9b3

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-53778(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.4.12osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 139 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-05 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-04 10:53 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-04 10:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-04 09:27 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  9. 2026-08-04 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-04 09:20 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  11. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-27 06:09 UTCOSV refresh
  20. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-23 02:29 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-07-22 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-10 00:45 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-21 11:01 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-53778?
CVE-2023-53778 is a high vulnerability published on December 9, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: accel/qaic: Clean up integer overflow checking in mapuserpages() The encodedma() function has some validation on intrans->size but it would be more clear to move those checks to findandmapuserpages(). The encode_dma() had two…
When was CVE-2023-53778 disclosed?
CVE-2023-53778 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 9, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-53778 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-53778 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-53778?
CVE-2023-53778 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-53778?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-53778, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-53778

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-53778?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.