In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bus: fsl-mc: don't assume child devices are all fsl-mc devices
Changes in VFIO caused a pseudo-device to be created as child of
fsl-mc devices causing a crash [1] when trying to bind a fsl-mc
device to VFIO. Fix this by checking the device type when enumerating
fsl-mc child devices.
[1]
Modules linked in:
Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 6 PID: 1289 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.2.0-rc5-00047-g7c46948a6e9c #2
Hardware name: NXP Layerscape LX2160ARDB (DT)
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : mc_send_command+0x24/0x1f0
lr : dprc_get_obj_region+0xfc/0x1c0
sp : ffff80000a88b900
x29: ffff80000a88b900 x28: ffff48a9429e1400 x27: 00000000000002b2
x26: ffff48a9429e1718 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
x23: ffffd59331ba3918 x22: ffffd59331ba3000 x21: 0000000000000000
x20: ffff80000a88b9b8 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000001
x17: 7270642f636d2d6c x16: 73662e3030303030 x15: ffffffffffffffff
x14: ffffd59330f1d668 x13: ffff48a8727dc389 x12: ffff48a8727dc386
x11: 0000000000000002 x10: 00008ceaf02f35d4 x9 : 0000000000000012
x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000006 x6 : ffff80000a88bab0
x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff80000a88b9e8
x2 : ffff80000a88b9e8 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff48a945142b80
Call trace:
mc_send_command+0x24/0x1f0
dprc_get_obj_region+0xfc/0x1c0
fsl_mc_device_add+0x340/0x590
fsl_mc_obj_device_add+0xd0/0xf8
dprc_scan_objects+0x1c4/0x340
dprc_scan_container+0x38/0x60
vfio_fsl_mc_probe+0x9c/0xf8
fsl_mc_driver_probe+0x24/0x70
really_probe+0xbc/0x2a8
__driver_probe_device+0x78/0xe0
device_driver_attach+0x30/0x68
bind_store+0xa8/0x130
drv_attr_store+0x24/0x38
sysfs_kf_write+0x44/0x60
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x128/0x1b8
vfs_write+0x334/0x448
ksys_write+0x68/0xf0
__arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28
invoke_syscall+0x44/0x108
el0_svc_common.constprop.1+0x94/0xf8
do_el0_svc+0x38/0xb0
el0_svc+0x20/0x50
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x98/0xc0
el0t_64_sync+0x174/0x178
Code: aa0103f4 a9025bf5 d5384100 b9400801 (79401260)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it