CVE-2023-53351

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-09-17. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/sched: Check scheduler work queue before calling timeout handling

During an IGT GPU reset test we see again oops despite of commit 0c8c901aaaebc9 (drm/sched: Check scheduler ready before calling timeout handling).

It uses ready condition whether to call drm_sched_fault which unwind the TDR leads to GPU reset. However it looks the ready condition is overloaded with other meanings, for example, for the following stack is related GPU reset :

0 gfx_v9_0_cp_gfx_start 1 gfx_v9_0_cp_gfx_resume 2 gfx_v9_0_cp_resume 3 gfx_v9_0_hw_init 4 gfx_v9_0_resume 5 amdgpu_device_ip_resume_phase2

does the following: /* start the ring */ gfx_v9_0_cp_gfx_start(adev); ring->sched.ready = true;

The same approach is for other ASICs as well : gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_resume gfx_v10_0_kiq_resume, etc...

As a result, our GPU reset test causes GPU fault which calls unconditionally gfx_v9_0_fault and then drm_sched_fault. However now it depends on whether the interrupt service routine drm_sched_fault is executed after gfx_v9_0_cp_gfx_start is completed which sets the ready field of the scheduler to true even for uninitialized schedulers and causes oops vs no fault or when ISR drm_sched_fault is completed prior gfx_v9_0_cp_gfx_start and NULL pointer dereference does not occur.

Use the field timeout_wq to prevent oops for uninitialized schedulers. The field could be initialized by the work queue of resetting the domain.

v1: Corrections to commit message (Luben)

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
6.0%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 17, 2025

Last Modified

January 14, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-53351(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-427.13.1.el9_42024-04-30redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 02:29 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 66 more
  1. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-06 14:11 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-18 02:35 UTCOSV refresh
  33. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-29 22:33 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-05-29 22:33 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-05-29 22:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-53351?
CVE-2023-53351 is a medium vulnerability published on September 17, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/sched: Check scheduler work queue before calling timeout handling During an IGT GPU reset test we see again oops despite of commit 0c8c901aaaebc9 (drm/sched: Check scheduler ready before calling timeout handling). It uses ready…
When was CVE-2023-53351 disclosed?
CVE-2023-53351 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 17, 2025, with the most recent update on January 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-53351 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-53351 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 6.0% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-53351?
CVE-2023-53351 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-53351?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-53351, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-53351

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-53351?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.