CVE-2023-53347

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-09-17. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/mlx5: Handle pairing of E-switch via uplink un/load APIs

In case user switch a device from switchdev mode to legacy mode, mlx5 first unpair the E-switch and afterwards unload the uplink vport. From the other hand, in case user remove or reload a device, mlx5 first unload the uplink vport and afterwards unpair the E-switch.

The latter is causing a bug[1], hence, handle pairing of E-switch as part of uplink un/load APIs.

[1] In case VF_LAG is used, every tc fdb flow is duplicated to the peer esw. However, the original esw keeps a pointer to this duplicated flow, not the peer esw. e.g.: if user create tc fdb flow over esw0, the flow is duplicated over esw1, in FW/HW, but in SW, esw0 keeps a pointer to the duplicated flow. During module unload while a peer tc fdb flow is still offloaded, in case the first device to be removed is the peer device (esw1 in the example above), the peer net-dev is destroyed, and so the mlx5e_priv is memset to 0. Afterwards, the peer device is trying to unpair himself from the original device (esw0 in the example above). Unpair API invoke the original device to clear peer flow from its eswitch (esw0), but the peer flow, which is stored over the original eswitch (esw0), is trying to use the peer mlx5e_priv, which is memset to 0 and result in bellow kernel-oops.

[ 157.964081 ] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 000000000002ce60 [ 157.964662 ] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 157.965123 ] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 157.965582 ] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 157.965866 ] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 157.967670 ] RIP: 0010:mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_flow+0x48/0x460 [mlx5_core] [ 157.976164 ] Call Trace: [ 157.976437 ] [ 157.976690 ] __mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peer_flow+0xe6/0x100 [mlx5_core] [ 157.977230 ] mlx5e_tc_clean_fdb_peer_flows+0x67/0x90 [mlx5_core] [ 157.977767 ] mlx5_esw_offloads_unpair+0x2d/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] [ 157.984653 ] mlx5_esw_offloads_devcom_event+0xbf/0x130 [mlx5_core] [ 157.985212 ] mlx5_devcom_send_event+0xa3/0xb0 [mlx5_core] [ 157.985714 ] esw_offloads_disable+0x5a/0x110 [mlx5_core] [ 157.986209 ] mlx5_eswitch_disable_locked+0x152/0x170 [mlx5_core] [ 157.986757 ] mlx5_eswitch_disable+0x51/0x80 [mlx5_core] [ 157.987248 ] mlx5_unload+0x2a/0xb0 [mlx5_core] [ 157.987678 ] mlx5_uninit_one+0x5f/0xd0 [mlx5_core] [ 157.988127 ] remove_one+0x64/0xe0 [mlx5_core] [ 157.988549 ] pci_device_remove+0x31/0xa0 [ 157.988933 ] device_release_driver_internal+0x18f/0x1f0 [ 157.989402 ] driver_detach+0x3f/0x80 [ 157.989754 ] bus_remove_driver+0x70/0xf0 [ 157.990129 ] pci_unregister_driver+0x34/0x90 [ 157.990537 ] mlx5_cleanup+0xc/0x1c [mlx5_core] [ 157.990972 ] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x15a/0x250 [ 157.991398 ] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xea/0x110 [ 157.991840 ] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 [ 157.992198 ] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
9%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 17, 2025

Last Modified

January 14, 2026

References (3)

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-53347(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.1.31—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-23 20:11 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-23 02:29 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-07-22 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-06 14:31 UTCOSV refresh
  15. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-18 02:35 UTCOSV refresh
  43. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-29 22:33 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-05-29 22:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Related CVEs(same product)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-53347?
CVE-2023-53347 is a medium vulnerability published on September 17, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5: Handle pairing of E-switch via uplink un/load APIs In case user switch a device from switchdev mode to legacy mode, mlx5 first unpair the E-switch and afterwards unload the uplink vport. From the other hand, in case user…
When was CVE-2023-53347 disclosed?
CVE-2023-53347 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 17, 2025, with the most recent update on January 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-53347 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-53347 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 91.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-53347?
CVE-2023-53347 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-53347?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-53347, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-53347

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-53347?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs