CVE-2023-53243

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-09-15. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: add handling for RAID1C23/DUP to btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile

Callers of btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile expect it to return exactly one allocation profile flag, and failing to do so may ultimately result in a WARN_ON and remount-ro when allocating new blocks, like the below transaction abort on 6.1.

btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile has two ways of determining the profile, first it checks if a conversion balance is currently running and uses the profile we're converting to. If no balance is currently running, it returns the max-redundancy profile which at least one block in the selected block group has.

This works by simply checking each known allocation profile bit in redundancy order. However, btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile has not been updated as new flags have been added - first with the DUP profile and later with the RAID1C34 profiles.

Because of the way it checks, if we have blocks with different profiles and at least one is known, that profile will be selected. However, if none are known we may return a flag set with multiple allocation profiles set.

This is currently only possible when a balance from one of the three unhandled profiles to another of the unhandled profiles is canceled after allocating at least one block using the new profile.

In that case, a transaction abort like the below will occur and the filesystem will need to be mounted with -o skip_balance to get it mounted rw again (but the balance cannot be resumed without a similar abort).

[770.648] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [770.648] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -22) [770.648] WARNING: CPU: 43 PID: 1159593 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4122 find_free_extent+0x1d94/0x1e00 [btrfs] [770.648] CPU: 43 PID: 1159593 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 6.1.0-0.deb11.7-powerpc64le #1 Debian 6.1.20-2~bpo11+1a~test [770.648] Hardware name: T2P9D01 REV 1.00 POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-bc106a0 PowerNV [770.648] NIP: c00800000f6784fc LR: c00800000f6784f8 CTR: c000000000d746c0 [770.648] REGS: c000200089afe9a0 TRAP: 0700 Tainted: G W (6.1.0-0.deb11.7-powerpc64le Debian 6.1.20-2~bpo11+1a~test) [770.648] MSR: 9000000002029033 CR: 28848282 XER: 20040000 [770.648] CFAR: c000000000135110 IRQMASK: 0 GPR00: c00800000f6784f8 c000200089afec40 c00800000f7ea800 0000000000000026 GPR04: 00000001004820c2 c000200089afea00 c000200089afe9f8 0000000000000027 GPR08: c000200ffbfe7f98 c000000002127f90 ffffffffffffffd8 0000000026d6a6e8 GPR12: 0000000028848282 c000200fff7f3800 5deadbeef0000122 c00000002269d000 GPR16: c0002008c7797c40 c000200089afef17 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 c000200008bc5a98 0000000000000001 GPR24: 0000000000000000 c0000003c73088d0 c000200089afef17 c000000016d3a800 GPR28: c0000003c7308800 c00000002269d000 ffffffffffffffea 0000000000000001 [770.648] NIP [c00800000f6784fc] find_free_extent+0x1d94/0x1e00 [btrfs] [770.648] LR [c00800000f6784f8] find_free_extent+0x1d90/0x1e00 [btrfs] [770.648] Call Trace: [770.648] [c000200089afec40] [c00800000f6784f8] find_free_extent+0x1d90/0x1e00 [btrfs] (unreliable) [770.648] [c000200089afed30] [c00800000f681398] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1a0/0x2f0 [btrfs] [770.648] [c000200089afeea0] [c00800000f681bf0] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x108/0x670 [btrfs] [770.648] [c000200089afeff0] [c00800000f66bd68] __btrfs_cow_block+0x170/0x850 [btrfs] [770.648] [c000200089aff100] [c00800000f66c58c] btrfs_cow_block+0x144/0x288 [btrfs] [770.648] [c000200089aff1b0] [c00800000f67113c] btrfs_search_slot+0x6b4/0xcb0 [btrfs] [770.648] [c000200089aff2a0] [c00800000f679f60] lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x128/0x7c0 [btrfs] [770.648] [c000200089aff3b0] [c00800000f67b338] lookup_extent_backref+0x70/0x190 [btrfs] [770.648] [c000200089aff470] [c00800000f67b54c] __btrfs_free_extent+0xf4/0x1490 [btrfs] [770.648] [ ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 15, 2025

Last Modified

January 14, 2026

References (5)

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.10.188—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 106 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-23 20:11 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-23 02:29 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-22 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-06 14:31 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-18 02:44 UTCOSV refresh
  49. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-53243?
CVE-2023-53243 is a medium vulnerability published on September 15, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: add handling for RAID1C23/DUP to btrfsreducealloc_profile Callers of btrfsreducealloc_profile expect it to return exactly one allocation profile flag, and failing to do so may ultimately result in a WARN_ON and remount-ro…
When was CVE-2023-53243 disclosed?
CVE-2023-53243 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 15, 2025, with the most recent update on January 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-53243 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-53243 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 95.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-53243?
CVE-2023-53243 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-53243?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-53243, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-53243

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-53243?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs