CVE-2023-52896

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2024-08-21. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2023-59607 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-7g59-fcf3-5hj5 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: fix race between quota rescan and disable leading to NULL pointer deref

If we have one task trying to start the quota rescan worker while another one is trying to disable quotas, we can end up hitting a race that results in the quota rescan worker doing a NULL pointer dereference. The steps for this are the following:

1) Quotas are enabled;

2) Task A calls the quota rescan ioctl and enters btrfs_qgroup_rescan(). It calls qgroup_rescan_init() which returns 0 (success) and then joins a transaction and commits it;

3) Task B calls the quota disable ioctl and enters btrfs_quota_disable(). It clears the bit BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED from fs_info->flags and calls btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which returns immediately since the rescan worker is not yet running. Then it starts a transaction and locks fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock;

4) Task A queues the rescan worker, by calling btrfs_queue_work();

5) The rescan worker starts, and calls rescan_should_stop() at the start of its while loop, which results in 0 iterations of the loop, since the flag BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED was cleared from fs_info->flags by task B at step 3);

6) Task B sets fs_info->quota_root to NULL;

7) The rescan worker tries to start a transaction and uses fs_info->quota_root as the root argument for btrfs_start_transaction(). This results in a NULL pointer dereference down the call chain of btrfs_start_transaction(). The stack trace is something like the one reported in Link tag below:

general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000041: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000208-0x000000000000020f] CPU: 1 PID: 34 Comm: kworker/u4:2 Not tainted 6.1.0-syzkaller-13872-gb6bb9676f216 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 Workqueue: btrfs-qgroup-rescan btrfs_work_helper RIP: 0010:start_transaction+0x48/0x10f0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:564 Code: 48 89 fb 48 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc90000ab7ab0 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000041 RBX: 0000000000000208 RCX: ffff88801779ba80 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffff52000156f5d R10: fffff52000156f5d R11: 1ffff92000156f5c R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000003 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f2bea75b718 CR3: 000000001d0cc000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x3bb/0x6a0 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:3402 btrfs_work_helper+0x312/0x850 fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:280 process_one_work+0x877/0xdb0 kernel/workqueue.c:2289 worker_thread+0xb14/0x1330 kernel/workqueue.c:2436 kthread+0x266/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308 Modules linked in:

So fix this by having the rescan worker function not attempt to start a transaction if it didn't do any rescan work.

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
21
EG Risk 21/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity47% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
15th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-07). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 21, 2024

Last Modified

September 11, 2024

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.4.230 (fixes >=0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (25 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.178-1: fixed in 5.10.178-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.1.8-1: fixed in 6.1.8-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.1.8-1: fixed in 6.1.8-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.1.8-1: fixed in 6.1.8-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 94 of 213 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 119 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-09 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  2. 2026-11-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  3. 2026-11-07 21:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7g59-fcf3-5hj5 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  4. 2026-11-07 21:18 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-11-07 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  6. 2026-11-06 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  7. 2026-11-05 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  8. 2026-11-04 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  9. 2026-11-03 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  10. 2026-11-02 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  11. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  12. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  13. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  14. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  15. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  16. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  17. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  18. 2026-10-25 17:28 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  20. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  21. 2026-10-24 11:40 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-24 11:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7g59-fcf3-5hj5 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  23. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  24. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  25. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  2. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  4. 2026-10-18 07:42 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  6. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  7. 2026-10-15 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  8. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  9. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  10. 2026-10-12 18:13 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  12. 2026-10-11 21:38 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  14. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  15. 2026-10-10 02:03 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  17. 2026-10-08 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  19. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  20. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  21. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  22. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  23. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  24. 2026-09-30 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  26. 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  27. 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  28. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  29. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  30. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  31. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  32. 2026-09-20 10:51 UTCOSV refresh
  33. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  34. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  35. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  36. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  37. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  38. 2026-09-12 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  39. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  40. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  41. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  42. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  43. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  44. 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  45. 2026-09-04 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  46. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  47. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  48. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  49. 2026-09-01 13:12 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-09-01 04:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  51. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  52. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  53. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  54. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  55. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  56. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  57. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  58. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  59. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  60. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  61. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  62. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  63. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  64. 2026-08-15 13:07 UTCOSV refresh
  65. 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  66. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  67. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  68. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  69. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-52896?
CVE-2023-52896 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 21, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix race between quota rescan and disable leading to NULL pointer deref If we have one task trying to start the quota rescan worker while another one is trying to disable quotas, we can end up hitting a race that results in…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-52896 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2023-52896 was published on August 21, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 11, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2023-52896 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-52896 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (15th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-52896?
CVE-2023-52896 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-52896?
A fix for CVE-2023-52896 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-52896

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-52896?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.