CVE-2023-52489

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-03-11. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/sparsemem: fix race in accessing memory_section->usage

The below race is observed on a PFN which falls into the device memory region with the system memory configuration where PFN's are such that [ZONE_NORMAL ZONE_DEVICE ZONE_NORMAL]. Since normal zone start and end pfn contains the device memory PFN's as well, the compaction triggered will try on the device memory PFN's too though they end up in NOP(because pfn_to_online_page() returns NULL for ZONE_DEVICE memory sections). When from other core, the section mappings are being removed for the ZONE_DEVICE region, that the PFN in question belongs to, on which compaction is currently being operated is resulting into the kernel crash with CONFIG_SPASEMEM_VMEMAP enabled. The crash logs can be seen at [1].

compact_zone() memunmap_pages ------------- --------------- __pageblock_pfn_to_page ...... (a)pfn_valid(): valid_section()//return true (b)__remove_pages()-> sparse_remove_section()-> section_deactivate(): [Free the array ms->usage and set ms->usage = NULL] pfn_section_valid() [Access ms->usage which is NULL]

NOTE: From the above it can be said that the race is reduced to between the pfn_valid()/pfn_section_valid() and the section deactivate with SPASEMEM_VMEMAP enabled.

The commit b943f045a9af("mm/sparse: fix kernel crash with pfn_section_valid check") tried to address the same problem by clearing the SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP with the expectation of valid_section() returns false thus ms->usage is not accessed.

Fix this issue by the below steps:

a) Clear SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP before freeing the ->usage.

b) RCU protected read side critical section will either return NULL when SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP is cleared or can successfully access ->usage.

c) Free the ->usage with kfree_rcu() and set ms->usage = NULL. No attempt will be made to access ->usage after this as the SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP is cleared thus valid_section() return false.

Thanks to David/Pavan for their inputs on this patch.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/

On Snapdragon SoC, with the mentioned memory configuration of PFN's as [ZONE_NORMAL ZONE_DEVICE ZONE_NORMAL], we are able to see bunch of issues daily while testing on a device farm.

For this particular issue below is the log. Though the below log is not directly pointing to the pfn_section_valid(){ ms->usage;}, when we loaded this dump on T32 lauterbach tool, it is pointing.

[ 540.578056] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 [ 540.578068] Mem abort info: [ 540.578070] ESR = 0x0000000096000005 [ 540.578073] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 540.578077] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 540.578080] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 540.578082] FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault [ 540.578085] Data abort info: [ 540.578086] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005 [ 540.578088] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 540.579431] pstate: 82400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO -DIT -SSBSBTYPE=--) [ 540.579436] pc : __pageblock_pfn_to_page+0x6c/0x14c [ 540.579454] lr : compact_zone+0x994/0x1058 [ 540.579460] sp : ffffffc03579b510 [ 540.579463] x29: ffffffc03579b510 x28: 0000000000235800 x27:000000000000000c [ 540.579470] x26: 0000000000235c00 x25: 0000000000000068 x24:ffffffc03579b640 [ 540.579477] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: ffffffc03579b660 x21:0000000000000000 [ 540.579483] x20: 0000000000235bff x19: ffffffdebf7e3940 x18:ffffffdebf66d140 [ 540.579489] x17: 00000000739ba063 x16: 00000000739ba063 x15:00000000009f4bff [ 540.579495] x14: 0000008000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12:0000000000000001 [ 540.579501] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 :ffffff897d2cd440 [ 540.579507] x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 :ffffffc03579b5b4 [ 540.579512] x5 : 0000000000027f25 x4 : ffffffc03579b5b8 x3 :0000000000000 ---truncated---

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
21
EG Risk 21/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity47% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
20th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

March 11, 2024

Last Modified

February 14, 2025

Patch Availability(22)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-5.105.10.136-1~deb10u1 ... 5.10.209-2~deb10u1 (13 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.216-1~deb10u1: fixed in 5.10.216-1~deb10u1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (39 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.216-1: fixed in 5.10.216-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.27-1 ... 6.1.76-1~bpo11+1 (17 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.76-1: fixed in 6.1.76-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.6.15-1: fixed in 6.6.15-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.6.15-1: fixed in 6.6.15-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(13)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 91 of 184 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 9 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 93 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  2. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  4. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  5. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  7. 2026-10-18 07:42 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  9. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  10. 2026-10-15 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  11. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  12. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  13. 2026-10-12 18:13 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  15. 2026-10-11 21:38 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 20:24 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  18. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  19. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  20. 2026-10-08 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  21. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  22. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  23. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  24. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  25. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
Show 66 more
  1. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  2. 2026-09-30 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  4. 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  5. 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  6. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  7. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  8. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  9. 2026-09-22 06:15 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  11. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  12. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  13. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  14. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  15. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  16. 2026-09-12 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  17. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  18. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  19. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  20. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  21. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  22. 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  23. 2026-09-04 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  24. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  25. 2026-09-03 03:29 UTCOSV refresh
  26. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  27. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  28. 2026-09-01 04:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  29. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  30. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  31. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  32. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  33. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  34. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  35. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  36. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  37. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  38. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  39. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  40. 2026-08-16 16:53 UTCOSV refresh
  41. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  42. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  43. 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  44. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  45. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  46. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  47. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  48. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  49. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  50. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  51. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  52. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  53. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  54. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  55. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  56. 2026-08-01 10:36 UTCOSV refresh
  57. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  58. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  59. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  60. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  61. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  62. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  63. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  64. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  65. 2026-07-23 02:29 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-07-22 23:15 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-52489?
CVE-2023-52489 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 11, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/sparsemem: fix race in accessing memory_section->usage The below race is observed on a PFN which falls into the device memory region with the system memory configuration where PFN's are such that [ZONENORMAL ZONEDEVICE…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-52489 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2023-52489 was published on March 11, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of February 14, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2023-52489 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-52489 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (20th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-52489?
CVE-2023-52489 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-52489?
A fix for CVE-2023-52489 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2023-52489 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-52489

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-52489?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.