In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/pseries/memhp: Fix access beyond end of drmem array
dlpar_memory_remove_by_index() may access beyond the bounds of the
drmem lmb array when the LMB lookup fails to match an entry with the
given DRC index. When the search fails, the cursor is left pointing to
&drmem_info->lmbs[drmem_info->n_lmbs], which is one element past the
last valid entry in the array. The debug message at the end of the
function then dereferences this pointer:
pr_debug("Failed to hot-remove memory at %llx\n",
lmb->base_addr);
This was found by inspection and confirmed with KASAN:
pseries-hotplug-mem: Attempting to hot-remove LMB, drc index 1234
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in dlpar_memory+0x298/0x1658
Read of size 8 at addr c000000364e97fd0 by task bash/949
dump_stack_lvl+0xa4/0xfc (unreliable)
print_report+0x214/0x63c
kasan_report+0x140/0x2e0
__asan_load8+0xa8/0xe0
dlpar_memory+0x298/0x1658
handle_dlpar_errorlog+0x130/0x1d0
dlpar_store+0x18c/0x3e0
kobj_attr_store+0x68/0xa0
sysfs_kf_write+0xc4/0x110
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x26c/0x390
vfs_write+0x2d4/0x4e0
ksys_write+0xac/0x1a0
system_call_exception+0x268/0x530
system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec
Allocated by task 1:
kasan_save_stack+0x48/0x80
kasan_set_track+0x34/0x50
kasan_save_alloc_info+0x34/0x50
__kasan_kmalloc+0xd0/0x120
__kmalloc+0x8c/0x320
kmalloc_array.constprop.0+0x48/0x5c
drmem_init+0x2a0/0x41c
do_one_initcall+0xe0/0x5c0
kernel_init_freeable+0x4ec/0x5a0
kernel_init+0x30/0x1e0
ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c
The buggy address belongs to the object at c000000364e80000
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-128k of size 131072
The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of
allocated 98256-byte region [c000000364e80000, c000000364e97fd0)
==================================================================
pseries-hotplug-mem: Failed to hot-remove memory at 0
Log failed lookups with a separate message and dereference the
cursor only when it points to a valid entry.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-20). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it