CVE-2023-4966

CRITICALNVD 7.59.4
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.4 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2023-10-18), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Exploited in the wild
9.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictMitigate nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • 2,681 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running an affected version — derived from Shodan data (© Shodan); a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
  • Linked to ransomware campaigns
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: >99.9%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: Metasploit · other public PoCExposed services: 2,681

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The CVE record's CNA (Citrix Systems, Inc.) lists Citrix NetScaler ADC versions 14.1 up to but not including 8.50, 13.1 up to but not including 49.15, 13.0 up to but not including 92.19, 13.1-FIPS up to but not including 37.164 and 2 more ranges; Citrix NetScaler Gateway versions 14.1 up to but not including 8.50, 13.1 up to but not including 49.15 and 13.0 up to but not including 92.19 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

Sensitive information disclosure in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway when configured as a Gateway (VPN virtual server, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) or AAA  virtual server.

Internet exposure · derived from Shodan data

2,681 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running a version that maps to CVE-2023-4966, in our KEV-Exposure radar’s Shodan-derived sample.

across 14 countries (Germany, Australia, United States, Mauritius, United Kingdom)top: netscaler_gateway🔒 ransomware-linked
See the KEV-Exposure radar →Derived from Shodan data. Shodan data is owned by Shodan, which holds its copyright (© Shodan). EchelonGraph claims no ownership of it or copyright in it. Aggregate, host-redacted.

How it counts: every 12 hours, when Shodan query credits allow, the radar runs one Shodan query per tracked product, reads up to 100 ip:port services per query, and keeps a service when its banner version matches a CISA-KEV or high-EPSS CVE; a service is dropped when neither a search nor a Shodan InternetDB port re-check has refreshed it for 21 days. A re-check that finds the port still listed by Shodan InternetDB refreshes the service without re-reading the banner, so a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open. A count is a banner-version inference over a sample, not an exploit test and not an internet-wide census, and the unit is a service, not a machine: a machine answering on two ports counts twice.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
9.4CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
97
EG Risk 97/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity94% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
>99.9%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.4 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
>99.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-22). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.

In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply mitigations and kill all active and persistent sessions per vendor instructions [https://www.netscaler.com/blog/news/cve-2023-4966-critical-security-update-now-available-for-netscaler-adc-and-netscaler-gateway/] OR discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://www.netscaler.com/blog/news/cve-2023-4966-critical-security-update-now-available-for-netscaler-adc-and-netscaler-gateway/ · https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX579459/netscaler-adc-and-netscaler-gateway-security-bulletin-for-cve20234966-and-cve20234967 · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-4966

Published

October 10, 2023

Last Modified

July 31, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 19, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). No fix on record yet. Sources: cisa.
CISA🔴 Active Exploitation

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2023-4966

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 154× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 948 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 848 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-22 19:41 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-22 19:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  3. 2026-10-21 18:52 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-21 18:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  5. 2026-10-20 18:04 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-20 18:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  7. 2026-10-19 17:15 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-19 17:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  9. 2026-10-18 16:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  10. 2026-10-18 07:45 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-17 20:34 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-17 20:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  13. 2026-10-16 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-16 19:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  15. 2026-10-15 18:57 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-15 18:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  17. 2026-10-14 18:07 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-14 18:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  19. 2026-10-13 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-13 17:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  21. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  23. 2026-10-12 07:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  24. 2026-10-12 03:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  25. 2026-10-12 00:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-11 20:12 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 20:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  3. 2026-10-11 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 16:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  5. 2026-10-11 12:30 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 12:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  7. 2026-10-11 08:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  8. 2026-10-11 04:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  9. 2026-10-11 01:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  10. 2026-10-10 21:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  11. 2026-10-10 17:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  12. 2026-10-10 13:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  13. 2026-10-10 09:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  14. 2026-10-10 05:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  15. 2026-10-10 02:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  16. 2026-10-09 22:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  17. 2026-10-09 18:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  18. 2026-10-09 14:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  19. 2026-10-09 10:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  20. 2026-10-09 06:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  21. 2026-10-09 03:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  22. 2026-10-08 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  23. 2026-10-08 19:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  24. 2026-10-08 15:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  25. 2026-10-08 11:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  26. 2026-10-08 07:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  27. 2026-10-08 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  28. 2026-10-08 00:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  29. 2026-10-07 20:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  30. 2026-10-07 16:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  31. 2026-10-07 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  32. 2026-10-07 08:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  33. 2026-10-07 05:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  34. 2026-10-07 01:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  35. 2026-10-06 21:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  36. 2026-10-06 17:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  37. 2026-10-06 13:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  38. 2026-10-06 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  39. 2026-10-06 06:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  40. 2026-10-06 06:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  41. 2026-10-06 06:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  42. 2026-10-06 06:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  43. 2026-10-06 02:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  44. 2026-10-05 22:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  45. 2026-10-05 18:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  46. 2026-10-05 14:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  47. 2026-10-05 10:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  48. 2026-10-05 07:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  49. 2026-10-05 03:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  50. 2026-10-04 23:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  51. 2026-10-04 19:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  52. 2026-10-04 15:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  53. 2026-10-04 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  54. 2026-10-04 08:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  55. 2026-10-04 04:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  56. 2026-10-04 00:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  57. 2026-10-03 20:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  58. 2026-10-03 16:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  59. 2026-10-03 13:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  60. 2026-10-03 09:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  61. 2026-10-03 05:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  62. 2026-10-03 01:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  63. 2026-10-02 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  64. 2026-10-02 17:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  65. 2026-10-02 14:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  66. 2026-10-02 10:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  67. 2026-10-02 06:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  68. 2026-10-02 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  69. 2026-10-01 22:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  70. 2026-10-01 19:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  71. 2026-10-01 15:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  72. 2026-10-01 11:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  73. 2026-10-01 07:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  74. 2026-10-01 03:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  75. 2026-09-30 23:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2g42-2pwg-93cj · GitHub CVSS 9.4

Publicly available exploits

(9 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 6 GitHub PoCs), as are 1 Nuclei detection template, 1 GitHub checker repository. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.

  • Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/http/citrix_bleed_cve_2023_4966✓ verified
    Published Oct 30, 2023

    Citrix ADC (NetScaler) Bleed Scanner

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCmorganwdavis/overread
    Published Dec 16, 2023

    Simulates CVE-2023-4966 Citrix Bleed overread bug

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCRevoltSecurities/CVE-2023-4966
    Published Oct 29, 2023

    An Exploitation script developed to exploit the CVE-2023-4966 bleed citrix information disclosure vulnerability

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub checkercertat/citrix-logchecker
    Published Oct 28, 2023

    Parse citrix netscaler logs to check for signs of CVE-2023-4966 exploitation

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCdinosn/citrix_cve-2023-4966
    Published Oct 25, 2023

    Citrix CVE-2023-4966 from assetnote modified for parallel and file handling

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCIceBreakerCode/CVE-2023-4966
    Published Oct 25, 2023
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCmlynchcogent/CVE-2023-4966-POC
    Published Oct 25, 2023

    Proof Of Concept for te NetScaler Vuln

    Open source ↗
  • Nucleihttp/cves/2023/CVE-2023-4966.yaml
    Published Oct 25, 2023

    Citrix Bleed - Leaking Session Tokens

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCChocapikk/CVE-2023-4966
    Published Oct 24, 2023

    Sensitive information disclosure in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway when configured as a Gateway (VPN virtual server, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) or AAA virtual server.

    Open source ↗

Past incidents using this CVE

(1)

This CVE was central to one or more publicly-documented breaches. Each card links to authoritative reporting at the time of the incident.

  • Citrix Bleed (NetScaler)Oct 2023

    NetScaler ADC/Gateway buffer over-read leaked session tokens, letting attackers bypass MFA. Exploited by ransomware groups (LockBit, Medusa) against Boeing, ICBC, and Comcast within weeks of disclosure.

    Source: BleepingComputer

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2023-4966?
CVE-2023-4966 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 10, 2023. Sensitive information disclosure in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway when configured as a Gateway (VPN virtual server, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) or AAA virtual server.
When was CVE-2023-4966 made public?
CVE-2023-4966 was made public on October 10, 2023: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Citrix Systems, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 10, 2023. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 31, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2023-4966 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2023-4966 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on October 18, 2023, affecting Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-4966?
CVE-2023-4966 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.4 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2023-4966?
CVE-2023-4966 affects Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway.
How do I remediate CVE-2023-4966?
No fix for CVE-2023-4966 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The CVE record's CNA (Citrix Systems, Inc.) lists Citrix NetScaler ADC versions 14.1 up to but not including 8.50, 13.1 up to but not including 49.15, 13.0 up to but not including 92.19, 13.1-FIPS up to but not including 37.164 and 2 more ranges; Citrix NetScaler Gateway versions 14.1 up to but not including 8.50, 13.1 up to but not including 49.15 and 13.0 up to but not including 92.19 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-4966

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-4966?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.