CVE-2023-47115

HIGHNVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 3.2%, top 13% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
Elevated
7.1
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 1%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Label Studio is an a popular open source data labeling tool. Versions prior to 1.9.2 have a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be exploited when an authenticated user uploads a crafted image file for their avatar that gets rendered as a HTML file on the website. Executing arbitrary JavaScript could result in an attacker performing malicious actions on Label Studio users if they visit the crafted avatar image. For an example, an attacker can craft a JavaScript payload that adds a new Django Super Administrator user if a Django administrator visits the image.

The file users/functions.py lines 18-49 show that the only verification check is that the file is an image by extracting the dimensions from the file. Label Studio serves avatar images using Django's built-in serve view, which is not secure for production use according to Django's documentation. The issue with the Django serve view is that it determines the Content-Type of the response by the file extension in the URL path. Therefore, an attacker can upload an image that contains malicious HTML code and name the file with a .html extension to be rendered as a HTML page. The only file extension validation is performed on the client-side, which can be easily bypassed.

Version 1.9.2 fixes this issue. Other remediation strategies include validating the file extension on the server side, not in client-side code; removing the use of Django's serve view and implement a secure controller for viewing uploaded avatar images; saving file content in the database rather than on the filesystem to mitigate against other file related vulnerabilities; and avoiding trusting user controlled inputs.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1(medium)
EPSS
70.2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

January 23, 2024

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
label-studio0.4.1 ... 1.9.1.post0 (74 versions)1.9.2

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-02 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-26 22:39 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 50 more
  1. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-09 09:48 UTCOSV refresh
  26. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-05-24 09:45 UTCEG score recompute

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Working exploit code is in the public domain. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.

  • Nucleihttp/cves/2023/CVE-2023-47115.yaml
    First seen Jan 1, 2023

    Label Studio - Cross-Site Scripting

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-47115?
CVE-2023-47115 is a high vulnerability published on January 23, 2024. Label Studio is an a popular open source data labeling tool. Versions prior to 1.9.2 have a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be exploited when an authenticated user uploads a crafted image file for their avatar that gets rendered as a HTML file on the website. Executing arbitrary…
When was CVE-2023-47115 disclosed?
CVE-2023-47115 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on January 23, 2024, with the most recent update on November 21, 2024. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-47115 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-47115 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 70.2% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-47115?
CVE-2023-47115 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-47115?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-47115, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-47115

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-47115?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.