CVE-2023-45249

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2024-07-29), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictMitigate nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 53%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: MetasploitExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The CVE record's CNA (Acronis International GmbH) lists Acronis Cyber Infrastructure versions before 5.0.1-61, before 5.1.1-71, before 5.2.1-69, before 5.3.1-53 and 1 more range as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

Remote command execution due to use of default passwords. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) before build 5.0.1-61, Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) before build 5.1.1-71, Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) before build 5.2.1-69, Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) before build 5.3.1-53, Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) before build 5.4.4-132.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
99
EG Risk 99/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
53%
EPSS %ILE
98th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
53% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-22). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.

In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://security-advisory.acronis.com/advisories/SEC-6452 · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-45249

Published

July 24, 2024

Last Modified

October 22, 2025

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 16, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). No fix on record yet. Sources: cisa.
CISA🔴 Active Exploitation

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2023-45249
Web page

Acronis Product Vulnerability Exploited in the Wild - SecurityWeek

https://www.securityweek.com/acronis-product-vulnerability-exploited-in-the-wild/
Web page

Acronis Advisory Database - Acronis

https://security-advisory.acronis.com/advisories/SEC-6452

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 182× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,076 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 976 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-23 02:37 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-23 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  4. 2026-10-22 03:07 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-22 03:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  7. 2026-10-21 03:39 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-21 03:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  10. 2026-10-20 04:10 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-20 04:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  13. 2026-10-19 04:36 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-19 04:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-18 05:06 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-18 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  18. 2026-10-17 05:37 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-17 05:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  21. 2026-10-16 06:09 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-16 06:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-15 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  24. 2026-10-15 06:39 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-15 06:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  2. 2026-10-14 07:10 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-14 07:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  5. 2026-10-13 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-10-12 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  8. 2026-10-12 08:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-10-12 04:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-10-12 00:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-11 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-10-11 16:07 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 16:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-11 12:08 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 12:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-11 08:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-11 04:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-11 00:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-10 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-10 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  23. 2026-10-10 16:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-10 12:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-10 08:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  26. 2026-10-10 04:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-10 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  28. 2026-10-09 20:10 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-09 20:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  30. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  31. 2026-10-09 16:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  32. 2026-10-09 12:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  33. 2026-10-09 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  34. 2026-10-09 04:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  35. 2026-10-09 00:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  36. 2026-10-08 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-08 20:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-10-08 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  39. 2026-10-08 16:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  40. 2026-10-08 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-10-08 08:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  42. 2026-10-08 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  43. 2026-10-08 00:17 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-08 00:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  45. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  46. 2026-10-07 20:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-07 16:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  48. 2026-10-07 12:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  49. 2026-10-07 08:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  50. 2026-10-07 04:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-07 00:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  52. 2026-10-06 20:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  53. 2026-10-06 16:19 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-10-06 16:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  56. 2026-10-06 12:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  57. 2026-10-06 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  58. 2026-10-06 04:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-06 00:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  60. 2026-10-05 20:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  61. 2026-10-05 16:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  62. 2026-10-05 12:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-10-05 08:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  64. 2026-10-05 04:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  65. 2026-10-05 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-10-05 00:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  67. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  68. 2026-10-04 20:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  69. 2026-10-04 16:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  70. 2026-10-04 12:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  71. 2026-10-04 08:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  72. 2026-10-04 04:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  73. 2026-10-04 00:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  74. 2026-10-03 20:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjfq-p48j-h96h · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  75. 2026-10-03 16:31 UTCEG score recompute

Publicly available exploits

(2 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.

  • Metasploitexploit/linux/http/acronis_cyber_infra_cve_2023_45249✓ verified
    Published Oct 2, 2024

    Acronis Cyber Infrastructure default password remote code execution

    Open source ↗
  • Nucleijavascript/cves/2023/CVE-2023-45249.yaml
    Published Sep 15, 2025

    Acronis Cyber Infrastructure - Default Password

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2023-45249?
CVE-2023-45249 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 24, 2024. Remote command execution due to use of default passwords. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) before build 5.0.1-61, Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) before build 5.1.1-71, Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) before build 5.2.1-69, Acronis Cyber Infrastructure…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-45249 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2023-45249 was published on July 24, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 22, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2023-45249 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2023-45249 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on July 29, 2024, affecting Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI). KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-45249?
CVE-2023-45249 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
Which products are affected by CVE-2023-45249?
CVE-2023-45249 affects Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-45249?
No fix for CVE-2023-45249 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The CVE record's CNA (Acronis International GmbH) lists Acronis Cyber Infrastructure versions before 5.0.1-61, before 5.1.1-71, before 5.2.1-69, before 5.3.1-53 and 1 more range as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-45249

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-45249?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.