In certain conditions for Calico Typha (v3.26.2, v3.25.1 and below), and Calico Enterprise Typha (v3.17.1, v3.16.3, v3.15.3 and below), a client TLS handshake can block the Calico Typha server indefinitely, resulting in denial of service. The TLS Handshake() call is performed inside the main server handle for loop without any timeout allowing an unclean TLS handshake to block the main loop indefinitely while other connections will be idle waiting for that handshake to finish.
CVE-2023-41378
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.7% (52nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 49EG Risk 49/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.Exploitation1% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 52nd
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
Published
November 6, 2023
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
References (3)
- psirt@tigera · CVE Programhttps://github.com/projectcalico/calico/pull/7908Issue Tracking
- psirt@tigera · CVE Programhttps://github.com/projectcalico/calico/pull/7993Issue Tracking · Patch
- psirt@tigera · CVE Programhttps://www.tigera.io/security-bulletins-tta-2023-001/Vendor Advisory
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/projectcalico/calico | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 27× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 80 of 180 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 20 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 100 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-30 16:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-22 17:38 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
Show 55 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-03 13:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-17 03:23 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-01 22:06 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
5 shownGo:github.com/projectcalico/calico
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-400 · CWE-703 · CWE-755
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2023-41378?
When was CVE-2023-41378 made public?
Is CVE-2023-41378 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-41378?
How do I remediate CVE-2023-41378?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-41378
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-41378?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.