CVE-2023-41359

CRITICALNVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2023-08-29. NVD baseline CVSS 9.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 5 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2023-45862 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.2%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

An issue was discovered in FRRouting FRR through 9.0. There is an out-of-bounds read in bgp_attr_aigp_valid in bgpd/bgp_attr.c because there is no check for the availability of two bytes during AIGP validation.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
41
EG Risk 41/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
1.2%
EPSS %ILE
67th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-09). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 29, 2023

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 1, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr.
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 38 Update: frr-8.5.3-1.fc38 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WXR6PIVY4SWO7HDT4EY733H4X32SCPM4/
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 39 Update: frr-8.5.3-1.fc39 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LMJNX44SMJM25JZO7XWHDQCOB4SNJPIE/
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 37 Update: frr-8.5.3-1.fc37 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JLG64IF3FU7V76K4TKCCXVNEE6P2VUDO/
GitHub pull request

bgpd: Make sure we have enough data to read two bytes when validating AIGP

Fix merged in FRRouting/frr PR #14232 on 2023-08-24 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/14232

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatfrr-0:8.5.3-4.el92024-04-30redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 31× in last 7d / 123× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 324 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 224 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-10 05:02 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-10 05:02 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-10 05:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  4. 2026-11-09 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  5. 2026-11-09 06:51 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-11-09 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-09 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  8. 2026-11-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  9. 2026-11-08 08:40 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-11-08 08:40 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-08 08:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  12. 2026-11-07 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  13. 2026-11-07 10:29 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-11-07 10:29 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-07 10:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  16. 2026-11-06 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  17. 2026-11-06 12:18 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-11-06 12:18 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-06 12:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  20. 2026-11-05 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  21. 2026-11-05 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-11-05 14:07 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-05 14:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  24. 2026-11-04 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  25. 2026-11-04 15:56 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-04 15:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  2. 2026-11-04 15:55 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-11-03 17:44 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-11-03 17:44 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-03 17:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  6. 2026-11-03 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  7. 2026-11-02 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-11-02 19:33 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-02 19:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  10. 2026-11-02 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  11. 2026-11-01 21:19 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-11-01 21:19 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-01 21:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  14. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  15. 2026-10-31 23:08 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-31 23:08 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-31 23:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  18. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  19. 2026-10-31 00:58 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-31 00:58 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-31 00:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  22. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  23. 2026-10-30 02:47 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-30 02:47 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-30 02:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  26. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  27. 2026-10-29 04:37 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-29 04:37 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-29 04:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  30. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  31. 2026-10-28 06:16 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-28 06:16 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-28 06:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  34. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  35. 2026-10-27 08:06 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-27 08:06 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-27 08:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  38. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  39. 2026-10-26 07:37 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-26 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  41. 2026-10-25 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  43. 2026-10-25 09:27 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-25 09:27 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-25 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  46. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  47. 2026-10-24 11:16 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-24 11:16 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-24 11:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  50. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  51. 2026-10-23 12:59 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-10-23 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-23 12:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  54. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  55. 2026-10-22 14:41 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-10-22 14:41 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-22 14:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  58. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  59. 2026-10-21 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-21 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  61. 2026-10-20 17:38 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-10-20 17:38 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-20 17:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  64. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  65. 2026-10-19 19:19 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-10-19 19:19 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-19 19:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  68. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  69. 2026-10-18 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-10-18 21:07 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-18 21:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pwgp-j234-4fgq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  72. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  73. 2026-10-18 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-10-17 22:37 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-10-17 22:37 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-41359?
CVE-2023-41359 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 29, 2023. An issue was discovered in FRRouting FRR through 9.0. There is an out-of-bounds read in bgp_attr_aigp_valid in bgpd/bgp_attr.c because there is no check for the availability of two bytes during AIGP validation.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-41359 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2023-41359 was published on August 29, 2023. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2023-41359 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-41359 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (67th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-41359?
CVE-2023-41359 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-41359?
A fix for CVE-2023-41359 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2023-41359 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-41359

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-41359?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.