CVE-2023-39913

HIGHNVD 8.88.8—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.5%, top 29% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
8.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 1%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Deserialization of Untrusted Data, Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache UIMA Java SDK, Apache UIMA Java SDK, Apache UIMA Java SDK, Apache UIMA Java SDK.This issue affects Apache UIMA Java SDK: before 3.5.0.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.5.0, which fixes the issue.

There are several locations in the code where serialized Java objects are deserialized without verifying the data. This affects in particular: * the deserialization of a Java-serialized CAS, but also other binary CAS formats that include TSI information using the CasIOUtils class; * the CAS Editor Eclipse plugin which uses the the CasIOUtils class to load data; * the deserialization of a Java-serialized CAS of the Vinci Analysis Engine service which can receive using Java-serialized CAS objects over network connections; * the CasAnnotationViewerApplet and the CasTreeViewerApplet; * the checkpointing feature of the CPE module.

Note that the UIMA framework by default does not start any remotely accessible services (i.e. Vinci) that would be vulnerable to this issue. A user or developer would need to make an active choice to start such a service. However, users or developers may use the CasIOUtils in their own applications and services to parse serialized CAS data. They are affected by this issue unless they ensure that the data passed to CasIOUtils is not a serialized Java object.

When using Vinci or using CasIOUtils in own services/applications, the unrestricted deserialization of Java-serialized CAS files may allow arbitrary (remote) code execution.

As a remedy, it is possible to set up a global or context-specific ObjectInputFilter (cf. https://openjdk.org/jeps/290  and  https://openjdk.org/jeps/415 ) if running UIMA on a Java version that supports it.

Note that Java 1.8 does not support the ObjectInputFilter, so there is no remedy when running on this out-of-support platform. An upgrade to a recent Java version is strongly recommended if you need to secure an UIMA version that is affected by this issue.

To mitigate the issue on a Java 9+ platform, you can configure a filter pattern through the "jdk.serialFilter" system property using a semicolon as a separator:

To allow deserializing Java-serialized binary CASes, add the classes: * org.apache.uima.cas.impl.CASCompleteSerializer * org.apache.uima.cas.impl.CASMgrSerializer * org.apache.uima.cas.impl.CASSerializer * java.lang.String

To allow deserializing CPE Checkpoint data, add the following classes (and any custom classes your application uses to store its checkpoints): * org.apache.uima.collection.impl.cpm.CheckpointData * org.apache.uima.util.ProcessTrace * org.apache.uima.util.impl.ProcessTrace_impl * org.apache.uima.collection.base_cpm.SynchPoint

Make sure to use "!*" as the final component to the filter pattern to disallow deserialization of any classes not listed in the pattern.

Apache UIMA 3.5.0 uses tightly scoped ObjectInputFilters when reading Java-serialized data depending on the type of data being expected. Configuring a global filter is not necessary with this version.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity88% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
71.0%
KEV
Not listed

Published

November 8, 2023

Last Modified

February 13, 2025

References (4)

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
org.apache.uima:uimaj2.3.13.5.0—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 49× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 110 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 02:25 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-22 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 04:49 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-27 05:23 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-09 15:47 UTCOSV refresh
  53. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Related CVEs(same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-39913?
CVE-2023-39913 is a high vulnerability published on November 8, 2023. Deserialization of Untrusted Data, Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache UIMA Java SDK, Apache UIMA Java SDK, Apache UIMA Java SDK, Apache UIMA Java SDK.This issue affects Apache UIMA Java SDK: before 3.5.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.5.0, which fixes the issue. There…
When was CVE-2023-39913 disclosed?
CVE-2023-39913 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on November 8, 2023, with the most recent update on February 13, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-39913 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-39913 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 71.0% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-39913?
CVE-2023-39913 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-39913?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-39913, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-39913

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-39913?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs