protocol-http1 provides a low-level implementation of the HTTP/1 protocol. RFC 9112 Section 7.1 defined the format of chunk size, chunk data and chunk extension. The value of Content-Length header should be a string of 0-9 digits, the chunk size should be a string of hex digits and should split from chunk data using CRLF, and the chunk extension shouldn't contain any invisible character. However, Falcon has following behaviors while disobey the corresponding RFCs: accepting Content-Length header values that have + prefix, accepting Content-Length header values that written in hexadecimal with 0x prefix, accepting 0x and + prefixed chunk size, and accepting LF in chunk extension. This behavior can lead to desync when forwarding through multiple HTTP parsers, potentially results in HTTP request smuggling and firewall bypassing. This issue is fixed in protocol-http1 v0.15.1. There are no known workarounds.
CVE-2023-38697
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This medium-severity CVE scores 5.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.8% (54th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.8
- EG Score
- 5.8MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 41EG Risk 41/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity58% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.8% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.8%
- EPSS %ILE
- 54th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.8 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.8% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 4, 2023
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
References (4)
- security-advisories@github · CVE Programhttps://github.com/socketry/protocol-http1/commit/e11fc164fd2b36f7b7e785e69fa8859eb06bceddPatch
- security-advisories@github · CVE Programhttps://github.com/socketry/protocol-http1/pull/20Issue Tracking
- security-advisories@github · CVE Programhttps://github.com/socketry/protocol-http1/security/advisories/GHSA-6jwc-qr2q-7xwjVendor Advisory
- security-advisories@github · CVE Programhttps://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112#name-chunked-transfer-codingTechnical Description
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-38697(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| ruby-protocol-http1 | 0.13.1-1 ... 0.40.0-1 (9 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| ruby-protocol-http1 | 0.14.6-1 ... 0.41.0-1 (6 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| ruby-protocol-http1 | 0.12.0-1 ... 0.14.6-1 (9 versions) |
| — |
RubyGems(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| protocol-http1 | 0.1.0 ... 0.9.0 (30 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 94 of 200 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 106 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-18 07:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-13 07:54 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-12 18:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-11 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-30 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
Show 69 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-29 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-23 03:02 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-22 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-03 21:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-17 11:16 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-02 05:58 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-27 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2023-38697?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-38697 published?
Is CVE-2023-38697 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-38697?
How do I remediate CVE-2023-38697?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-38697
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-38697?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.