This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (32nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
A fix is available — apply it.
There exists an vulnerability causing an abort() to be called in gRPC. The following headers cause gRPC's C++ implementation to abort() when called via http2:
te: x (x != trailers)
:scheme: x (x != http, https)
grpclb_client_stats: x (x == anything)
On top of sending one of those headers, a later header must be sent that gets the total header size past 8KB. We recommend upgrading past git commit 2485fa94bd8a723e5c977d55a3ce10b301b437f8 or v1.53 and above.
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
June 9, 2023
November 21, 2024
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhc-worker-playbook-0:0.1.10-1.el9_5 | 2024-12-03 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| io.grpc:grpc-protobuf | 1.51.0, 1.51.1, 1.51.3, 1.52.0, 1.52.1 |
| — |
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| grpcio | 1.51.0 ... 1.53.0rc2 (6 versions) |
| — |
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| grpc | 1.51.0, 1.52.0, 1.52.0.pre2, 1.52.2, 1.53.0.pre2 |
| — |
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 171 total refreshes for this CVE.
Maven:io.grpc:grpc-protobuf · RubyGems:grpc · PyPI:grpcio
redhat:RHSA-2024:10761
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-1428
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.