In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: mts64: fix possible null-ptr-defer in snd_mts64_interrupt
I got a null-ptr-defer error report when I do the following tests
on the qemu platform:
make defconfig and CONFIG_PARPORT=m, CONFIG_PARPORT_PC=m,
CONFIG_SND_MTS64=m
Then making test scripts:
cat>test_mod1.sh<
snd_mts64_interrupt+0x24/0xa0 [snd_mts64]
parport_irq_handler+0x37/0x50 [parport]
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x39/0x190
handle_irq_event_percpu+0xa/0x30
handle_irq_event+0x2f/0x50
handle_edge_irq+0x99/0x1b0
__common_interrupt+0x5d/0x100
common_interrupt+0xa0/0xc0
asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40
RIP: 0010:_raw_write_unlock_irqrestore+0x11/0x30
parport_claim+0xbd/0x230 [parport]
snd_mts64_probe+0x14a/0x465 [snd_mts64]
platform_probe+0x3f/0xa0
really_probe+0x129/0x2c0
__driver_probe_device+0x6d/0xc0
driver_probe_device+0x1a/0xa0
__device_attach_driver+0x7a/0xb0
bus_for_each_drv+0x62/0xb0
__device_attach+0xe4/0x180
bus_probe_device+0x82/0xa0
device_add+0x550/0x920
platform_device_add+0x106/0x220
snd_mts64_attach+0x2e/0x80 [snd_mts64]
port_check+0x14/0x20 [parport]
bus_for_each_dev+0x6e/0xc0
__parport_register_driver+0x7c/0xb0 [parport]
snd_mts64_module_init+0x31/0x1000 [snd_mts64]
do_one_initcall+0x3c/0x1f0
do_init_module+0x46/0x1c6
load_module+0x1d8d/0x1e10
__do_sys_finit_module+0xa2/0xf0
do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Rebooting in 1 seconds..
The mts wa not initialized during interrupt, we add check for
mts to fix this bug.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-26). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it