CVE-2022-50665

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-12-09. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: ath11k: fix failed to find the peer with peer_id 0 when disconnected

It has a fail log which is ath11k_dbg in ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status(), as below, it will not print when debug_mask is not set ATH11K_DBG_DATA. ath11k_dbg(ab, ATH11K_DBG_DATA, "failed to find the peer with peer_id %d\n", ppdu_info.peer_id);

When run scan with station disconnected, the peer_id is 0 for case HAL_RX_MPDU_START in ath11k_hal_rx_parse_mon_status_tlv() which called from ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status(), and the peer_id of ppdu_info is reset to 0 in the while loop, so it does not match condition of the check "if (ppdu_info->peer_id == HAL_INVALID_PEERID" in the loop, and then the log "failed to find the peer with peer_id 0" print after the check in the loop, it is below call stack when debug_mask is set ATH11K_DBG_DATA.

The reason is this commit 01d2f285e3e5 ("ath11k: decode HE status tlv") add "memset(ppdu_info, 0, sizeof(struct hal_rx_mon_ppdu_info))" in ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status(), but the commit does not initialize the peer_id to HAL_INVALID_PEERID, then lead the check mis-match.

Callstack of the failed log: [12335.689072] RIP: 0010:ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0x9ea/0x1020 [ath11k] [12335.689157] Code: 89 ff e8 f9 10 00 00 be 01 00 00 00 4c 89 f7 e8 dc 4b 4e de 48 8b 85 38 ff ff ff c7 80 e4 07 00 00 01 00 00 00 e9 20 f8 ff ff <0f> 0b 41 0f b7 96 be 06 00 00 48 c7 c6 b8 50 44 c1 4c 89 ff e8 fd [12335.689180] RSP: 0018:ffffb874001a4ca0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [12335.689210] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff995642cbd100 RCX: 0000000000000000 [12335.689229] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff99564212cd18 [12335.689248] RBP: ffffb874001a4dc0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [12335.689268] R10: 0000000000000220 R11: ffffb874001a48e8 R12: ffff995642473d40 [12335.689286] R13: ffff99564212c5b8 R14: ffff9956424736a0 R15: ffff995642120000 [12335.689303] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff995739000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [12335.689323] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [12335.689341] CR2: 00007f43c5d5e039 CR3: 000000011c012005 CR4: 00000000000606e0 [12335.689360] Call Trace: [12335.689377] [12335.689418] ? rcu_read_lock_held_common+0x12/0x50 [12335.689447] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x25/0x80 [12335.689471] ? rcu_read_lock_held_common+0x12/0x50 [12335.689504] ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x8d/0x4f0 [ath11k] [12335.689578] ? ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x8d/0x4f0 [ath11k] [12335.689653] ? lock_acquire+0xef/0x360 [12335.689681] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x25/0x80 [12335.689713] ath11k_dp_service_mon_ring+0x38/0x60 [ath11k] [12335.689784] ? ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x4f0/0x4f0 [ath11k] [12335.689860] call_timer_fn+0xb2/0x2f0 [12335.689897] ? ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x4f0/0x4f0 [ath11k] [12335.689970] run_timer_softirq+0x21f/0x540 [12335.689999] ? ktime_get+0xad/0x160 [12335.690025] ? lapic_next_deadline+0x2c/0x40 [12335.690053] ? clockevents_program_event+0x82/0x100 [12335.690093] __do_softirq+0x151/0x4a8 [12335.690135] irq_exit_rcu+0xc9/0x100 [12335.690165] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa8/0xd0 [12335.690189] [12335.690204] [12335.690225] asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20

Reset the default value to HAL_INVALID_PEERID each time after memset of ppdu_info as well as others memset which existed in function ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status(), then the failed log disappeared.

Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1(medium)
EG Risk
37(Track)
EG Risk 37/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
21%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 9, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

References (3)

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-50665(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.19.17—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 51× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 156 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-05 09:19 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-05 09:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:52 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-04 10:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-04 09:26 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.10
  9. 2026-08-04 09:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-04 09:20 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.1 · severity → HIGH
  11. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-27 05:39 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-23 02:17 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-22 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-10 00:17 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-21 11:01 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore

Related CVEs(same product)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-50665?
CVE-2022-50665 is a high vulnerability published on December 9, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: ath11k: fix failed to find the peer with peer_id 0 when disconnected It has a fail log which is ath11kdbg in ath11kdprxprocessmonstatus(), as below, it will not print when debugmask is not set ATH11KDBG_DATA. ath11kdbg(ab,…
When was CVE-2022-50665 disclosed?
CVE-2022-50665 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 9, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-50665 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-50665 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 79.3% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-50665?
CVE-2022-50665 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.1 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-50665?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-50665, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-50665

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-50665?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs