CVE-2022-50579

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scored
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS v2: Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

arm64: ftrace: fix module PLTs with mcount

Li Huafei reports that mcount-based ftrace with module PLTs was broken by commit:

a6253579977e4c6f ("arm64: ftrace: consistently handle PLTs.")

When a module PLTs are used and a module is loaded sufficiently far away from the kernel, we'll create PLTs for any branches which are out-of-range. These are separate from the special ftrace trampoline PLTs, which the module PLT code doesn't directly manipulate.

When mcount is in use this is a problem, as each mcount callsite in a module will be initialized to point to a module PLT, but since commit a6253579977e4c6f ftrace_make_nop() will assume that the callsite has been initialized to point to the special ftrace trampoline PLT, and ftrace_find_callable_addr() rejects other cases.

This means that when ftrace tries to initialize a callsite via ftrace_make_nop(), the call to ftrace_find_callable_addr() will find that the _mcount stub is out-of-range and is not handled by the ftrace PLT, resulting in a splat:

| ftrace_test: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. | ftrace: no module PLT for _mcount | ------------[ ftrace bug ]------------ | ftrace failed to modify | [] 0xffff800029180014 | actual: 44:00:00:94 | Initializing ftrace call sites | ftrace record flags: 2000000 | (0) | expected tramp: ffff80000802eb3c | ------------[ cut here ]------------ | WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 157 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2120 ftrace_bug+0x94/0x270 | Modules linked in: | CPU: 3 PID: 157 Comm: insmod Tainted: G O 6.0.0-rc6-00151-gcd722513a189-dirty #22 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) | pc : ftrace_bug+0x94/0x270 | lr : ftrace_bug+0x21c/0x270 | sp : ffff80000b2bbaf0 | x29: ffff80000b2bbaf0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff0000c4d38000 | x26: 0000000000000001 x25: ffff800009d7e000 x24: ffff0000c4d86e00 | x23: 0000000002000000 x22: ffff80000a62b000 x21: ffff8000098ebea8 | x20: ffff0000c4d38000 x19: ffff80000aa24158 x18: ffffffffffffffff | x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0a0d2d2d2d2d2d2d x15: ffff800009aa9118 | x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 6333626532303830 x12: 3030303866666666 | x11: 203a706d61727420 x10: 6465746365707865 x9 : 3362653230383030 | x8 : c0000000ffffefff x7 : 0000000000017fe8 x6 : 000000000000bff4 | x5 : 0000000000057fa8 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 | x2 : ad2cb14bb5438900 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000022 | Call trace: | ftrace_bug+0x94/0x270 | ftrace_process_locs+0x308/0x430 | ftrace_module_init+0x44/0x60 | load_module+0x15b4/0x1ce8 | __do_sys_init_module+0x1ec/0x238 | __arm64_sys_init_module+0x24/0x30 | invoke_syscall+0x54/0x118 | el0_svc_common.constprop.4+0x84/0x100 | do_el0_svc+0x3c/0xd0 | el0_svc+0x1c/0x50 | el0t_64_sync_handler+0x90/0xb8 | el0t_64_sync+0x15c/0x160 | ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- | ---------test_init-----------

Fix this by reverting to the old behaviour of ignoring the old instruction when initialising an mcount callsite in a module, which was the behaviour prior to commit a6253579977e4c6f.

CVSS v3
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
EG Risk
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
10%
KEV
Not listed

Published

October 22, 2025

Last Modified

April 15, 2026

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.10.150osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 148 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-27 09:39 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-23 02:17 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-07-22 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-10 03:54 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-21 14:31 UTCOSV refresh
  42. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-02 10:09 UTCOSV refresh
  75. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2022-50579?
CVE-2022-50579 is a publicly disclosed vulnerability published on October 22, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: arm64: ftrace: fix module PLTs with mcount Li Huafei reports that mcount-based ftrace with module PLTs was broken by commit: a6253579977e4c6f ("arm64: ftrace: consistently handle PLTs.") When a module PLTs are used and a module is…
When was CVE-2022-50579 disclosed?
CVE-2022-50579 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on October 22, 2025, with the most recent update on April 15, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-50579 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-50579 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 89.8% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2022-50579?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-50579, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-50579

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-50579?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.