In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/huge_memory: do not clobber swp_entry_t during THP split
The following has been observed when running stressng mmap since commit
b653db77350c ("mm: Clear page->private when splitting or migrating a page")
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#75 stuck for 26s! [stress-ng:9546]
CPU: 75 PID: 9546 Comm: stress-ng Tainted: G E 6.0.0-revert-b653db77-fix+ #29 0357d79b60fb09775f678e4f3f64ef0579ad1374
Hardware name: SGI.COM C2112-4GP3/X10DRT-P-Series, BIOS 2.0a 05/09/2016
RIP: 0010:xas_descend+0x28/0x80
Code: cc cc 0f b6 0e 48 8b 57 08 48 d3 ea 83 e2 3f 89 d0 48 83 c0 04 48 8b 44 c6 08 48 89 77 18 48 89 c1 83 e1 03 48 83 f9 02 75 08 <48> 3d fd 00 00 00 76 08 88 57 12 c3 cc cc cc cc 48 c1 e8 02 89 c2
RSP: 0018:ffffbbf02a2236a8 EFLAGS: 00000246
RAX: ffff9cab7d6a0002 RBX: ffffe04b0af88040 RCX: 0000000000000002
RDX: 0000000000000030 RSI: ffff9cab60509b60 RDI: ffffbbf02a2236c0
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff9cab60509b60 R09: ffffbbf02a2236c0
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffbbf02a223698 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffff9cab4e28da80 R14: 0000000000039c01 R15: ffff9cab4e28da88
FS: 00007fab89b85e40(0000) GS:ffff9cea3fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fab84e00000 CR3: 00000040b73a4003 CR4: 00000000003706e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
xas_load+0x3a/0x50
__filemap_get_folio+0x80/0x370
? put_swap_page+0x163/0x360
pagecache_get_page+0x13/0x90
__try_to_reclaim_swap+0x50/0x190
scan_swap_map_slots+0x31e/0x670
get_swap_pages+0x226/0x3c0
folio_alloc_swap+0x1cc/0x240
add_to_swap+0x14/0x70
shrink_page_list+0x968/0xbc0
reclaim_page_list+0x70/0xf0
reclaim_pages+0xdd/0x120
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range+0x814/0xf30
walk_pgd_range+0x637/0xa30
__walk_page_range+0x142/0x170
walk_page_range+0x146/0x170
madvise_pageout+0xb7/0x280
? asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40
madvise_vma_behavior+0x3b7/0xac0
? find_vma+0x4a/0x70
? find_vma+0x64/0x70
? madvise_vma_anon_name+0x40/0x40
madvise_walk_vmas+0xa6/0x130
do_madvise+0x2f4/0x360
__x64_sys_madvise+0x26/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x80
? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x17/0x40
? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x17/0x40
? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
? common_interrupt+0x8b/0xa0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
The problem can be reproduced with the mmtests config
config-workload-stressng-mmap. It does not always happen and when it
triggers is variable but it has happened on multiple machines.
The intent of commit b653db77350c patch was to avoid the case where
PG_private is clear but folio->private is not-NULL. However, THP tail
pages uses page->private for "swp_entry_t if folio_test_swapcache()" as
stated in the documentation for struct folio. This patch only clobbers
page->private for tail pages if the head page was not in swapcache and
warns once if page->private had an unexpected value.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it