CVE-2022-50483

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-10-04. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: enetc: avoid buffer leaks on xdp_do_redirect() failure

Before enetc_clean_rx_ring_xdp() calls xdp_do_redirect(), each software BD in the RX ring between index orig_i and i can have one of 2 refcount values on its page.

We are the owner of the current buffer that is being processed, so the refcount will be at least 1.

If the current owner of the buffer at the diametrically opposed index in the RX ring (i.o.w, the other half of this page) has not yet called kfree(), this page's refcount could even be 2.

enetc_page_reusable() in enetc_flip_rx_buff() tests for the page refcount against 1, and [ if it's 2 ] does not attempt to reuse it.

But if enetc_flip_rx_buff() is put after the xdp_do_redirect() call, the page refcount can have one of 3 values. It can also be 0, if there is no owner of the other page half, and xdp_do_redirect() for this buffer ran so far that it triggered a flush of the devmap/cpumap bulk queue, and the consumers of those bulk queues also freed the buffer, all by the time xdp_do_redirect() returns the execution back to enetc.

This is the reason why enetc_flip_rx_buff() is called before xdp_do_redirect(), but there is a big flaw with that reasoning: enetc_flip_rx_buff() will set rx_swbd->page = NULL on both sides of the enetc_page_reusable() branch, and if xdp_do_redirect() returns an error, we call enetc_xdp_free(), which does not deal gracefully with that.

In fact, what happens is quite special. The page refcounts start as 1. enetc_flip_rx_buff() figures they're reusable, transfers these rx_swbd->page pointers to a different rx_swbd in enetc_reuse_page(), and bumps the refcount to 2. When xdp_do_redirect() later returns an error, we call the no-op enetc_xdp_free(), but we still haven't lost the reference to that page. A copy of it is still at rx_ring->next_to_alloc, but that has refcount 2 (and there are no concurrent owners of it in flight, to drop the refcount). What really kills the system is when we'll flip the rx_swbd->page the second time around. With an updated refcount of 2, the page will not be reusable and we'll really leak it. Then enetc_new_page() will have to allocate more pages, which will then eventually leak again on further errors from xdp_do_redirect().

The problem, summarized, is that we zeroize rx_swbd->page before we're completely done with it, and this makes it impossible for the error path to do something with it.

Since the packet is potentially multi-buffer and therefore the rx_swbd->page is potentially an array, manual passing of the old pointers between enetc_flip_rx_buff() and enetc_xdp_free() is a bit difficult.

For the sake of going with a simple solution, we accept the possibility of racing with xdp_do_redirect(), and we move the flip procedure to execute only on the redirect success path. By racing, I mean that the page may be deemed as not reusable by enetc (having a refcount of 0), but there will be no leak in that case, either.

Once we accept that, we have something better to do with buffers on XDP_REDIRECT failure. Since we haven't performed half-page flipping yet, we won't, either (and this way, we can avoid enetc_xdp_free() completely, which gives the entire page to the slab allocator). Instead, we'll call enetc_xdp_drop(), which will recycle this half of the buffer back to the RX ring.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
32%
KEV
Not listed

Published

October 4, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.15.86osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 49× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 114 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-05 09:19 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-05 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:57 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-04 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-04 09:30 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-04 09:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-23 18:41 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-23 02:17 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-07-22 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-06 13:11 UTCOSV refresh
  27. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-18 01:05 UTCOSV refresh
  55. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-50483?
CVE-2022-50483 is a medium vulnerability published on October 4, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: enetc: avoid buffer leaks on xdpdoredirect() failure Before enetccleanrxringxdp() calls xdpdoredirect(), each software BD in the RX ring between index orig_i and i can have one of 2 refcount values on its page. We are the…
When was CVE-2022-50483 disclosed?
CVE-2022-50483 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on October 4, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-50483 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-50483 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 67.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-50483?
CVE-2022-50483 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-50483?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-50483, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-50483

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-50483?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.