CVE-2022-50456

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-10-01. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: fix resolving backrefs for inline extent followed by prealloc

If a file consists of an inline extent followed by a regular or prealloc extent, then a legitimate attempt to resolve a logical address in the non-inline region will result in add_all_parents reading the invalid offset field of the inline extent. If the inline extent item is placed in the leaf eb s.t. it is the first item, attempting to access the offset field will not only be meaningless, it will go past the end of the eb and cause this panic:

[17.626048] BTRFS warning (device dm-2): bad eb member end: ptr 0x3fd4 start 30834688 member offset 16377 size 8 [17.631693] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x5088000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [17.635041] CPU: 2 PID: 1267 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.12.0-07246-g75175d5adc74-dirty #199 [17.637969] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [17.641995] RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_64+0xe7/0x110 [17.649890] RSP: 0018:ffffc90001f73a08 EFLAGS: 00010202 [17.651652] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff88810c42d000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [17.653921] RDX: 0005088000000000 RSI: ffffc90001f73a0f RDI: 0000000000000001 [17.656174] RBP: 0000000000000ff9 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: c0000000fffeffff [17.658441] R10: ffffc90001f73790 R11: ffffc90001f73788 R12: ffff888106afe918 [17.661070] R13: 0000000000003fd4 R14: 0000000000003f6f R15: cdcdcdcdcdcdcdcd [17.663617] FS: 00007f64e7627d80(0000) GS:ffff888237c80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [17.666525] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [17.668664] CR2: 000055d4a39152e8 CR3: 000000010c596002 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 [17.671253] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [17.673634] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [17.676034] PKRU: 55555554 [17.677004] Call Trace: [17.677877] add_all_parents+0x276/0x480 [17.679325] find_parent_nodes+0xfae/0x1590 [17.680771] btrfs_find_all_leafs+0x5e/0xa0 [17.682217] iterate_extent_inodes+0xce/0x260 [17.683809] ? btrfs_inode_flags_to_xflags+0x50/0x50 [17.685597] ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0xa1/0xd0 [17.687404] iterate_inodes_from_logical+0xa1/0xd0 [17.689121] ? btrfs_inode_flags_to_xflags+0x50/0x50 [17.691010] btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0x131/0x190 [17.692946] btrfs_ioctl+0x104a/0x2f60 [17.694384] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x182/0x220 [17.695995] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0 [17.697394] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0 [17.698697] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [17.700017] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [17.701753] RIP: 0033:0x7f64e72761b7 [17.709355] RSP: 002b:00007ffefb067f58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [17.712088] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f64e72761b7 [17.714667] RDX: 00007ffefb067fb0 RSI: 00000000c0389424 RDI: 0000000000000003 [17.717386] RBP: 00007ffefb06d188 R08: 000055d4a390d2b0 R09: 00007f64e7340a60 [17.719938] R10: 0000000000000231 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [17.722383] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000c0389424 R15: 000055d4a38fd2a0 [17.724839] Modules linked in:

Fix the bug by detecting the inline extent item in add_all_parents and skipping to the next extent item.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

October 1, 2025

Last Modified

January 16, 2026

References (6)

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.4.229—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 109 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-23 19:11 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-23 02:17 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-22 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-06 13:11 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-18 01:35 UTCOSV refresh
  51. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore

Related CVEs(same product)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-50456?
CVE-2022-50456 is a medium vulnerability published on October 1, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix resolving backrefs for inline extent followed by prealloc If a file consists of an inline extent followed by a regular or prealloc extent, then a legitimate attempt to resolve a logical address in the non-inline region…
When was CVE-2022-50456 disclosed?
CVE-2022-50456 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on October 1, 2025, with the most recent update on January 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-50456 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-50456 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 95.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-50456?
CVE-2022-50456 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-50456?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-50456, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-50456

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-50456?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs