CVE-2022-50396

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-09-18. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: sched: fix memory leak in tcindex_set_parms

Syzkaller reports a memory leak as follows: ==================================== BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff88810c287f00 (size 256): comm "syz-executor105", pid 3600, jiffies 4294943292 (age 12.990s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] kmalloc_trace+0x20/0x90 mm/slab_common.c:1046 [] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:576 [inline] [] kmalloc_array include/linux/slab.h:627 [inline] [] kcalloc include/linux/slab.h:659 [inline] [] tcf_exts_init include/net/pkt_cls.h:250 [inline] [] tcindex_set_parms+0xa7/0xbe0 net/sched/cls_tcindex.c:342 [] tcindex_change+0xdf/0x120 net/sched/cls_tcindex.c:553 [] tc_new_tfilter+0x4f2/0x1100 net/sched/cls_api.c:2147 [] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x4dc/0x5d0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6082 [] netlink_rcv_skb+0x87/0x1d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2540 [] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline] [] netlink_unicast+0x397/0x4c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 [] netlink_sendmsg+0x396/0x710 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921 [] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline] [] sock_sendmsg+0x56/0x80 net/socket.c:734 [] ____sys_sendmsg+0x178/0x410 net/socket.c:2482 [] ___sys_sendmsg+0xa8/0x110 net/socket.c:2536 [] __sys_sendmmsg+0x105/0x330 net/socket.c:2622 [] __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline] [] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2648 [inline] [] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0x24/0x30 net/socket.c:2648 [] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] [] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 [] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd ====================================

Kernel uses tcindex_change() to change an existing filter properties.

Yet the problem is that, during the process of changing, if old_r is retrieved from p->perfect, then kernel uses tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash() to newly allocate filter results, uses tcindex_filter_result_init() to clear the old filter result, without destroying its tcf_exts structure, which triggers the above memory leak.

To be more specific, there are only two source for the old_r, according to the tcindex_lookup(). old_r is retrieved from p->perfect, or old_r is retrieved from p->h.

* If old_r is retrieved from p->perfect, kernel uses tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash() to newly allocate the filter results. Then r is assigned with cp->perfect + handle, which is newly allocated. So condition old_r && old_r != r is true in this situation, and kernel uses tcindex_filter_result_init() to clear the old filter result, without destroying its tcf_exts structure

* If old_r is retrieved from p->h, then p->perfect is NULL according to the tcindex_lookup(). Considering that cp->h is directly copied from p->h and p->perfect is NULL, r is assigned with tcindex_lookup(cp, handle), whose value should be the same as old_r, so condition old_r && old_r != r is false in this situation, kernel ignores using tcindex_filter_result_init() to clear the old filter result.

So only when old_r is retrieved from p->perfect does kernel use tcindex_filter_result_init() to clear the old filter result, which triggers the above memory leak.

Considering that there already exists a tc_filter_wq workqueue to destroy the old tcindex_d ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
5.5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 18, 2025

Last Modified

January 14, 2026

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-513.5.1.el8_92023-11-14redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-372.64.1.el8_62023-07-18redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-284.11.1.el9_22023-05-09redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 02:17 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 66 more
  1. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-06 14:11 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-18 02:14 UTCOSV refresh
  31. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-29 22:28 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-05-29 22:28 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-05-29 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-50396?
CVE-2022-50396 is a medium vulnerability published on September 18, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: sched: fix memory leak in tcindexsetparms Syzkaller reports a memory leak as follows: ==================================== BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff88810c287f00 (size 256): comm "syz-executor105", pid 3600,…
When was CVE-2022-50396 disclosed?
CVE-2022-50396 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 18, 2025, with the most recent update on January 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-50396 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-50396 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 5.5% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-50396?
CVE-2022-50396 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-50396?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-50396, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-50396

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-50396?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.