In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
coresight: trbe: remove cpuhp instance node before remove cpuhp state
cpuhp_state_add_instance() and cpuhp_state_remove_instance() should
be used in pairs. Or there will lead to the warn on
cpuhp_remove_multi_state() since the cpuhp_step list is not empty.
The following is the error log with 'rmmod coresight-trbe':
Error: Removing state 215 which has instances left.
Call trace:
__cpuhp_remove_state_cpuslocked+0x144/0x160
__cpuhp_remove_state+0xac/0x100
arm_trbe_device_remove+0x2c/0x60 [coresight_trbe]
platform_remove+0x34/0x70
device_remove+0x54/0x90
device_release_driver_internal+0x1e4/0x250
driver_detach+0x5c/0xb0
bus_remove_driver+0x64/0xc0
driver_unregister+0x3c/0x70
platform_driver_unregister+0x20/0x30
arm_trbe_exit+0x1c/0x658 [coresight_trbe]
__arm64_sys_delete_module+0x1ac/0x24c
invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x58/0x1a0
do_el0_svc+0x38/0xd0
el0_svc+0x2c/0xc0
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x1ac/0x1b0
el0t_64_sync+0x19c/0x1a0
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it