CVE-2022-50257

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-09-15. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xen/gntdev: Prevent leaking grants

Prior to this commit, if a grant mapping operation failed partially, some of the entries in the map_ops array would be invalid, whereas all of the entries in the kmap_ops array would be valid. This in turn would cause the following logic in gntdev_map_grant_pages to become invalid:

for (i = 0; i < map->count; i++) { if (map->map_ops[i].status == GNTST_okay) { map->unmap_ops[i].handle = map->map_ops[i].handle; if (!use_ptemod) alloced++; } if (use_ptemod) { if (map->kmap_ops[i].status == GNTST_okay) { if (map->map_ops[i].status == GNTST_okay) alloced++; map->kunmap_ops[i].handle = map->kmap_ops[i].handle; } } } ... atomic_add(alloced, &map->live_grants);

Assume that use_ptemod is true (i.e., the domain mapping the granted pages is a paravirtualized domain). In the code excerpt above, note that the "alloced" variable is only incremented when both kmap_ops[i].status and map_ops[i].status are set to GNTST_okay (i.e., both mapping operations are successful). However, as also noted above, there are cases where a grant mapping operation fails partially, breaking the assumption of the code excerpt above.

The aforementioned causes map->live_grants to be incorrectly set. In some cases, all of the map_ops mappings fail, but all of the kmap_ops mappings succeed, meaning that live_grants may remain zero. This in turn makes it impossible to unmap the successfully grant-mapped pages pointed to by kmap_ops, because unmap_grant_pages has the following snippet of code at its beginning:

if (atomic_read(&map->live_grants) == 0) return; /* Nothing to do */

In other cases where only some of the map_ops mappings fail but all kmap_ops mappings succeed, live_grants is made positive, but when the user requests unmapping the grant-mapped pages, __unmap_grant_pages_done will then make map->live_grants negative, because the latter function does not check if all of the pages that were requested to be unmapped were actually unmapped, and the same function unconditionally subtracts "data->count" (i.e., a value that can be greater than map->live_grants) from map->live_grants. The side effects of a negative live_grants value have not been studied.

The net effect of all of this is that grant references are leaked in one of the above conditions. In Qubes OS v4.1 (which uses Xen's grant mechanism extensively for X11 GUI isolation), this issue manifests itself with warning messages like the following to be printed out by the Linux kernel in the VM that had granted pages (that contain X11 GUI window data) to dom0: "g.e. 0x1234 still pending", especially after the user rapidly resizes GUI VM windows (causing some grant-mapping operations to partially or completely fail, due to the fact that the VM unshares some of the pages as part of the window resizing, making the pages impossible to grant-map from dom0).

The fix for this issue involves counting all successful map_ops and kmap_ops mappings separately, and then adding the sum to live_grants. During unmapping, only the number of successfully unmapped grants is subtracted from live_grants. The code is also modified to check for negative live_grants values after the subtraction and warn the user.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 15, 2025

Last Modified

November 25, 2025

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 4.9.332osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 107 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-23 20:11 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-23 02:17 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-22 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-06 14:41 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-18 03:05 UTCOSV refresh
  49. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-50257?
CVE-2022-50257 is a medium vulnerability published on September 15, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xen/gntdev: Prevent leaking grants Prior to this commit, if a grant mapping operation failed partially, some of the entries in the map_ops array would be invalid, whereas all of the entries in the kmap_ops array would be valid.…
When was CVE-2022-50257 disclosed?
CVE-2022-50257 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 15, 2025, with the most recent update on November 25, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-50257 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-50257 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 95.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-50257?
CVE-2022-50257 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-50257?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-50257, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-50257

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-50257?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.