In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: ensure pages are unlocked on cow_file_range() failure
There is a hung_task report on zoned btrfs like below.
https://github.com/naota/linux/issues/59
[726.328648] INFO: task rocksdb:high0:11085 blocked for more than 241 seconds.
[726.329839] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1+ #1
[726.330484] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[726.331603] task:rocksdb:high0 state:D stack: 0 pid:11085 ppid: 11082 flags:0x00000000
[726.331608] Call Trace:
[726.331611]
[726.331614] __schedule+0x2e5/0x9d0
[726.331622] schedule+0x58/0xd0
[726.331626] io_schedule+0x3f/0x70
[726.331629] __folio_lock+0x125/0x200
[726.331634] ? find_get_entries+0x1bc/0x240
[726.331638] ? filemap_invalidate_unlock_two+0x40/0x40
[726.331642] truncate_inode_pages_range+0x5b2/0x770
[726.331649] truncate_inode_pages_final+0x44/0x50
[726.331653] btrfs_evict_inode+0x67/0x480
[726.331658] evict+0xd0/0x180
[726.331661] iput+0x13f/0x200
[726.331664] do_unlinkat+0x1c0/0x2b0
[726.331668] __x64_sys_unlink+0x23/0x30
[726.331670] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[726.331674] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[726.331677] RIP: 0033:0x7fb9490a171b
[726.331681] RSP: 002b:00007fb943ffac68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000057
[726.331684] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fb9490a171b
[726.331686] RDX: 00007fb943ffb040 RSI: 000055a6bbe6ec20 RDI: 00007fb94400d300
[726.331687] RBP: 00007fb943ffad00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[726.331688] R10: 0000000000000031 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fb943ffb000
[726.331690] R13: 00007fb943ffb040 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007fb943ffd260
[726.331693]
While we debug the issue, we found running fstests generic/551 on 5GB
non-zoned null_blk device in the emulated zoned mode also had a
similar hung issue.
Also, we can reproduce the same symptom with an error injected
cow_file_range() setup.
The hang occurs when cow_file_range() fails in the middle of
allocation. cow_file_range() called from do_allocation_zoned() can
split the give region ([start, end]) for allocation depending on
current block group usages. When btrfs can allocate bytes for one part
of the split regions but fails for the other region (e.g. because of
-ENOSPC), we return the error leaving the pages in the succeeded regions
locked. Technically, this occurs only when @unlock == 0. Otherwise, we
unlock the pages in an allocated region after creating an ordered
extent.
Considering the callers of cow_file_range(unlock=0) won't write out
the pages, we can unlock the pages on error exit from
cow_file_range(). So, we can ensure all the pages except @locked_page
are unlocked on error case.
In summary, cow_file_range now behaves like this:
- page_started == 1 (return value)
- All the pages are unlocked. IO is started.
- unlock == 1
- All the pages except @locked_page are unlocked in any case
- unlock == 0
- On success, all the pages are locked for writing out them
- On failure, all the pages except @locked_page are unlocked
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it