CVE-2022-49872

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-05-01. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed head alloc types

Since commit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splitting gso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list"), it is allowed to change gso_size of a GRO packet. However, that commit assumes that "checking the first list_skb member suffices; i.e if either of the list_skb members have non head_frag head, then the first one has too".

It turns out this assumption does not hold. We've seen BUG_ON being hit in skb_segment when skbs on the frag_list had differing head_frag with the vmxnet3 driver. This happens because __netdev_alloc_skb and __napi_alloc_skb can return a skb that is page backed or kmalloced depending on the requested size. As the result, the last small skb in the GRO packet can be kmalloced.

There are three different locations where this can be fixed:

(1) We could check head_frag in GRO and not allow GROing skbs with different head_frag. However, that would lead to performance regression on normal forward paths with unmodified gso_size, where !head_frag in the last packet is not a problem.

(2) Set a flag in bpf_skb_net_grow and bpf_skb_net_shrink indicating that NETIF_F_SG is undesirable. That would need to eat a bit in sk_buff. Furthermore, that flag can be unset when all skbs on the frag_list are page backed. To retain good performance, bpf_skb_net_grow/shrink would have to walk the frag_list.

(3) Walk the frag_list in skb_segment when determining whether NETIF_F_SG should be cleared. This of course slows things down.

This patch implements (3). To limit the performance impact in skb_segment, the list is walked only for skbs with SKB_GSO_DODGY set that have gso_size changed. Normal paths thus will not hit it.

We could check only the last skb but since we need to walk the whole list anyway, let's stay on the safe side.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
29
EG Risk 29/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
42nd
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

May 1, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-49872(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-477.10.1.el8_82023-05-16redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-284.11.1.el9_22023-05-09redhat
linuxKernel @ 4.9.334 (fixes >=0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (22 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.158-1: fixed in 5.10.158-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.0.10-1: fixed in 6.0.10-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.0.10-1: fixed in 6.0.10-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.0.10-1: fixed in 6.0.10-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 22× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 173 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-08 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-30 16:12 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-26 19:03 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-09-26 15:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-15 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-07 04:18 UTCOSV refresh
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-20 14:01 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-05 09:29 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-05 09:29 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-05 09:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-04 11:05 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-04 11:05 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-04 11:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-04 09:44 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-04 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-04 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-24 07:41 UTCOSV refresh
  53. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-23 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-07-22 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49872?
CVE-2022-49872 is a medium vulnerability published on May 1, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed head alloc types Since commit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splitting gsosize mangled skb having linear-headed fraglist"), it is allowed to change gso_size of a GRO…
When was CVE-2022-49872 disclosed?
CVE-2022-49872 was first published on May 1, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-49872 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49872 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (42nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49872?
CVE-2022-49872 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49872?
A fix for CVE-2022-49872 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2022-49872 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-49872

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49872?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.