CVE-2022-49767

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-05-01. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

9p/trans_fd: always use O_NONBLOCK read/write

syzbot is reporting hung task at p9_fd_close() [1], for p9_mux_poll_stop() from p9_conn_destroy() from p9_fd_close() is failing to interrupt already started kernel_read() from p9_fd_read() from p9_read_work() and/or kernel_write() from p9_fd_write() from p9_write_work() requests.

Since p9_socket_open() sets O_NONBLOCK flag, p9_mux_poll_stop() does not need to interrupt kernel_read()/kernel_write(). However, since p9_fd_open() does not set O_NONBLOCK flag, but pipe blocks unless signal is pending, p9_mux_poll_stop() needs to interrupt kernel_read()/kernel_write() when the file descriptor refers to a pipe. In other words, pipe file descriptor needs to be handled as if socket file descriptor.

We somehow need to interrupt kernel_read()/kernel_write() on pipes.

A minimal change, which this patch is doing, is to set O_NONBLOCK flag from p9_fd_open(), for O_NONBLOCK flag does not affect reading/writing of regular files. But this approach changes O_NONBLOCK flag on userspace- supplied file descriptors (which might break userspace programs), and O_NONBLOCK flag could be changed by userspace. It would be possible to set O_NONBLOCK flag every time p9_fd_read()/p9_fd_write() is invoked, but still remains small race window for clearing O_NONBLOCK flag.

If we don't want to manipulate O_NONBLOCK flag, we might be able to surround kernel_read()/kernel_write() with set_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING) and recalc_sigpending(). Since p9_read_work()/p9_write_work() works are processed by kernel threads which process global system_wq workqueue, signals could not be delivered from remote threads when p9_mux_poll_stop() from p9_conn_destroy() from p9_fd_close() is called. Therefore, calling set_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING)/recalc_sigpending() every time would be needed if we count on signals for making kernel_read()/kernel_write() non-blocking.

[Dominique: add comment at Christian's suggestion]

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
10%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 1, 2025

Last Modified

November 6, 2025

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 4.9.334osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (22 versions)5.10.158-1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.0.10-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.0.10-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.0.10-1

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 3× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 142 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-15 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-13 13:54 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-25 15:10 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-09 07:27 UTCOSV refresh
  13. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-24 07:41 UTCOSV refresh
  29. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-07-23 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-07-22 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-07 03:21 UTCOSV refresh
  56. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49767?
CVE-2022-49767 is a medium vulnerability published on May 1, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: 9p/transfd: always use ONONBLOCK read/write syzbot is reporting hung task at p9fdclose() [1], for p9muxpoll_stop() from p9conndestroy() from p9fdclose() is failing to interrupt already started kernelread() from p9fdread() from…
When was CVE-2022-49767 disclosed?
CVE-2022-49767 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 1, 2025, with the most recent update on November 6, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-49767 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49767 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 90.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49767?
CVE-2022-49767 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49767?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-49767, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-49767

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49767?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.