CVE-2022-49337

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-09-22. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ocfs2: dlmfs: fix error handling of user_dlm_destroy_lock

When user_dlm_destroy_lock failed, it didn't clean up the flags it set before exit. For USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN, if this function fails because of lock is still in used, next time when unlink invokes this function, it will return succeed, and then unlink will remove inode and dentry if lock is not in used(file closed), but the dlm lock is still linked in dlm lock resource, then when bast come in, it will trigger a panic due to user-after-free. See the following panic call trace. To fix this, USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN should be reverted if fail. And also error should be returned if USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is set to let user know that unlink fail.

For the case of ocfs2_dlm_unlock failure, besides USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN, USER_LOCK_BUSY is also required to be cleared. Even though spin lock is released in between, but USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is still set, for USER_LOCK_BUSY, if before every place that waits on this flag, USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN is checked to bail out, that will make sure no flow waits on the busy flag set by user_dlm_destroy_lock(), then we can simplely revert USER_LOCK_BUSY when ocfs2_dlm_unlock fails. Fix user_dlm_cluster_lock() which is the only function not following this.

[ 941.336392] (python,26174,16):dlmfs_unlink:562 ERROR: unlink 004fb0000060000b5a90b8c847b72e1, error -16 from destroy [ 989.757536] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 989.757709] kernel BUG at fs/ocfs2/dlmfs/userdlm.c:173! [ 989.757876] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 989.758027] Modules linked in: ksplice_2zhuk2jr_ib_ipoib_new(O) ksplice_2zhuk2jr(O) mptctl mptbase xen_netback xen_blkback xen_gntalloc xen_gntdev xen_evtchn cdc_ether usbnet mii ocfs2 jbd2 rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 nfsv3 nfs_acl nfs fscache lockd grace ocfs2_dlmfs ocfs2_stack_o2cb ocfs2_dlm ocfs2_nodemanager ocfs2_stackglue configfs bnx2fc fcoe libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc sunrpc ipmi_devintf bridge stp llc rds_rdma rds bonding ib_sdp ib_ipoib rdma_ucm ib_ucm ib_uverbs ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm falcon_lsm_serviceable(PE) falcon_nf_netcontain(PE) mlx4_vnic falcon_kal(E) falcon_lsm_pinned_13402(E) mlx4_ib ib_sa ib_mad ib_core ib_addr xenfs xen_privcmd dm_multipath iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support pcspkr sb_edac edac_core i2c_i801 lpc_ich mfd_core ipmi_ssif i2c_core ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler [ 989.760686] ioatdma sg ext3 jbd mbcache sd_mod ahci libahci ixgbe dca ptp pps_core vxlan udp_tunnel ip6_udp_tunnel megaraid_sas mlx4_core crc32c_intel be2iscsi bnx2i cnic uio cxgb4i cxgb4 cxgb3i libcxgbi ipv6 cxgb3 mdio libiscsi_tcp qla4xxx iscsi_boot_sysfs libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi wmi dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod [last unloaded: ksplice_2zhuk2jr_ib_ipoib_old] [ 989.761987] CPU: 10 PID: 19102 Comm: dlm_thread Tainted: P OE 4.1.12-124.57.1.el6uek.x86_64 #2 [ 989.762290] Hardware name: Oracle Corporation ORACLE SERVER X5-2/ASM,MOTHERBOARD,1U, BIOS 30350100 06/17/2021 [ 989.762599] task: ffff880178af6200 ti: ffff88017f7c8000 task.ti: ffff88017f7c8000 [ 989.762848] RIP: e030:[] [] __user_dlm_queue_lockres.part.4+0x76/0x80 [ocfs2_dlmfs] [ 989.763185] RSP: e02b:ffff88017f7cbcb8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 989.763353] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880174d48008 RCX: 0000000000000003 [ 989.763565] RDX: 0000000000120012 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: ffff880174d48170 [ 989.763778] RBP: ffff88017f7cbcc8 R08: ffff88021f4293b0 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 989.763991] R10: ffff880179c8c000 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff880174d48008 [ 989.764204] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: ffff880179c8c000 R15: ffff88021db7a000 [ 989.764422] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880247480000(0000) knlGS:ffff880247480000 [ 989.764685] CS: e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 989.764865] CR2: ffff8000007f6800 CR3: 0000000001ae0000 CR4: 0000000000042660 [ 989.765081] Stack: [ 989.765167] 00000000000 ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
9.0%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 26, 2025

Last Modified

September 22, 2025

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 67 more
  1. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-07 09:51 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-18 20:44 UTCOSV refresh
  30. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-30 10:59 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-05-30 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-05-29 20:20 UTCOSV refresh
  67. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49337?
CVE-2022-49337 is a medium vulnerability published on February 26, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: dlmfs: fix error handling of userdlmdestroy_lock When userdlmdestroy_lock failed, it didn't clean up the flags it set before exit. For USERLOCKIN_TEARDOWN, if this function fails because of lock is still in used, next time…
When was CVE-2022-49337 disclosed?
CVE-2022-49337 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 26, 2025, with the most recent update on September 22, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-49337 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49337 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 9.0% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49337?
CVE-2022-49337 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49337?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-49337, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-49337

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49337?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.