CVE-2022-49266

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-10-21. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

block: fix rq-qos breakage from skipping rq_qos_done_bio()

a647a524a467 ("block: don't call rq_qos_ops->done_bio if the bio isn't tracked") made bio_endio() skip rq_qos_done_bio() if BIO_TRACKED is not set. While this fixed a potential oops, it also broke blk-iocost by skipping the done_bio callback for merged bios.

Before, whether a bio goes through rq_qos_throttle() or rq_qos_merge(), rq_qos_done_bio() would be called on the bio on completion with BIO_TRACKED distinguishing the former from the latter. rq_qos_done_bio() is not called for bios which wenth through rq_qos_merge(). This royally confuses blk-iocost as the merged bios never finish and are considered perpetually in-flight.

One reliably reproducible failure mode is an intermediate cgroup geting stuck active preventing its children from being activated due to the leaf-only rule, leading to loss of control. The following is from resctl-bench protection scenario which emulates isolating a web server like workload from a memory bomb run on an iocost configuration which should yield a reasonable level of protection.

# cat /sys/block/nvme2n1/device/model Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB # cat /sys/fs/cgroup/io.cost.model 259:0 ctrl=user model=linear rbps=834913556 rseqiops=93622 rrandiops=102913 wbps=618985353 wseqiops=72325 wrandiops=71025 # cat /sys/fs/cgroup/io.cost.qos 259:0 enable=1 ctrl=user rpct=95.00 rlat=18776 wpct=95.00 wlat=8897 min=60.00 max=100.00 # resctl-bench -m 29.6G -r out.json run protection::scenario=mem-hog,loops=1 ... Memory Hog Summary ==================

IO Latency: R p50=242u:336u/2.5m p90=794u:1.4m/7.5m p99=2.7m:8.0m/62.5m max=8.0m:36.4m/350m W p50=221u:323u/1.5m p90=709u:1.2m/5.5m p99=1.5m:2.5m/9.5m max=6.9m:35.9m/350m

Isolation and Request Latency Impact Distributions:

min p01 p05 p10 p25 p50 p75 p90 p95 p99 max mean stdev isol% 15.90 15.90 15.90 40.05 57.24 59.07 60.01 74.63 74.63 90.35 90.35 58.12 15.82 lat-imp% 0 0 0 0 0 4.55 14.68 15.54 233.5 548.1 548.1 53.88 143.6

Result: isol=58.12:15.82% lat_imp=53.88%:143.6 work_csv=100.0% missing=3.96%

The isolation result of 58.12% is close to what this device would show without any IO control.

Fix it by introducing a new flag BIO_QOS_MERGED to mark merged bios and calling rq_qos_done_bio() on them too. For consistency and clarity, rename BIO_TRACKED to BIO_QOS_THROTTLED. The flag checks are moved into rq_qos_done_bio() so that it's next to the code paths that set the flags.

With the patch applied, the above same benchmark shows:

# resctl-bench -m 29.6G -r out.json run protection::scenario=mem-hog,loops=1 ... Memory Hog Summary ==================

IO Latency: R p50=123u:84.4u/985u p90=322u:256u/2.5m p99=1.6m:1.4m/9.5m max=11.1m:36.0m/350m W p50=429u:274u/995u p90=1.7m:1.3m/4.5m p99=3.4m:2.7m/11.5m max=7.9m:5.9m/26.5m

Isolation and Request Latency Impact Distributions:

min p01 p05 p10 p25 p50 p75 p90 p95 p99 max mean stdev isol% 84.91 84.91 89.51 90.73 92.31 94.49 96.36 98.04 98.71 100.0 100.0 94.42 2.81 lat-imp% 0 0 0 0 0 2.81 5.73 11.11 13.92 17.53 22.61 4.10 4.68

Result: isol=94.42:2.81% lat_imp=4.10%:4.68 work_csv=58.34% missing=0%

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
20%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 26, 2025

Last Modified

October 21, 2025

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.15.54osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 113 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-24 14:11 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-23 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-22 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-07 09:51 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-18 21:05 UTCOSV refresh
  51. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49266?
CVE-2022-49266 is a medium vulnerability published on February 26, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: fix rq-qos breakage from skipping rqqosdone_bio() a647a524a467 ("block: don't call rqqosops->done_bio if the bio isn't tracked") made bioendio() skip rqqosdonebio() if BIO_TRACKED is not set. While this fixed a potential…
When was CVE-2022-49266 disclosed?
CVE-2022-49266 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 26, 2025, with the most recent update on October 21, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-49266 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49266 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 79.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49266?
CVE-2022-49266 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49266?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-49266, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-49266

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49266?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.