CVE-2022-49194

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-10-21. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: bcmgenet: Use stronger register read/writes to assure ordering

GCC12 appears to be much smarter about its dependency tracking and is aware that the relaxed variants are just normal loads and stores and this is causing problems like:

[ 210.074549] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 210.079223] NETDEV WATCHDOG: enabcm6e4ei0 (bcmgenet): transmit queue 1 timed out [ 210.086717] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:529 dev_watchdog+0x234/0x240 [ 210.095044] Modules linked in: genet(E) nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat] [ 210.146561] ACPI CPPC: PCC check channel failed for ss: 0. ret=-110 [ 210.146927] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G E 5.17.0-rc7G12+ #58 [ 210.153226] CPPC Cpufreq:cppc_scale_freq_workfn: failed to read perf counters [ 210.161349] Hardware name: Raspberry Pi Foundation Raspberry Pi 4 Model B/Raspberry Pi 4 Model B, BIOS EDK2-DEV 02/08/2022 [ 210.161353] pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 210.161358] pc : dev_watchdog+0x234/0x240 [ 210.161364] lr : dev_watchdog+0x234/0x240 [ 210.161368] sp : ffff8000080a3a40 [ 210.161370] x29: ffff8000080a3a40 x28: ffffcd425af87000 x27: ffff8000080a3b20 [ 210.205150] x26: ffffcd425aa00000 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: ffffcd425af8ec08 [ 210.212321] x23: 0000000000000100 x22: ffffcd425af87000 x21: ffff55b142688000 [ 210.219491] x20: 0000000000000001 x19: ffff55b1426884c8 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 210.226661] x17: 64656d6974203120 x16: 0000000000000001 x15: 6d736e617274203a [ 210.233831] x14: 2974656e65676d63 x13: ffffcd4259c300d8 x12: ffffcd425b07d5f0 [ 210.241001] x11: 00000000ffffffff x10: ffffcd425b07d5f0 x9 : ffffcd4258bdad9c [ 210.248171] x8 : 00000000ffffdfff x7 : 000000000000003f x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 210.255341] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000001000 [ 210.262511] x2 : 0000000000001000 x1 : 0000000000000005 x0 : 0000000000000044 [ 210.269682] Call trace: [ 210.272133] dev_watchdog+0x234/0x240 [ 210.275811] call_timer_fn+0x3c/0x15c [ 210.279489] __run_timers.part.0+0x288/0x310 [ 210.283777] run_timer_softirq+0x48/0x80 [ 210.287716] __do_softirq+0x128/0x360 [ 210.291392] __irq_exit_rcu+0x138/0x140 [ 210.295243] irq_exit_rcu+0x1c/0x30 [ 210.298745] el1_interrupt+0x38/0x54 [ 210.302334] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24 [ 210.306445] el1h_64_irq+0x7c/0x80 [ 210.309857] arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x2c [ 210.313445] default_idle_call+0x4c/0x140 [ 210.317470] cpuidle_idle_call+0x14c/0x1a0 [ 210.321584] do_idle+0xb0/0x100 [ 210.324737] cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x8c [ 210.328675] secondary_start_kernel+0xe4/0x110 [ 210.333138] __secondary_switched+0x94/0x98

The assumption when these were relaxed seems to be that device memory would be mapped non reordering, and that other constructs (spinlocks/etc) would provide the barriers to assure that packet data and in memory rings/queues were ordered with respect to device register reads/writes. This itself seems a bit sketchy, but the real problem with GCC12 is that it is moving the actual reads/writes around at will as though they were independent operations when in truth they are not, but the compiler can't know that. When looking at the assembly dumps for many of these routines its possible to see very clean, but not strictly in program order operations occurring as the compiler would be free to do if these weren't actually register reads/write operations.

Its possible to suppress the timeout with a liberal bit of dma_mb()'s sprinkled around but the device still seems unable to reliably send/receive data. A better plan is to use the safer readl/writel everywhere.

Since this partially reverts an older commit, which notes the use of the relaxed variants for performance reasons. I would suggest that any performance problems ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
30(Track)
EG Risk 30/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
48%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 26, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

References (5)

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.10.110—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 51× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 119 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-05 09:35 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-05 09:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-04 11:16 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-04 11:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-04 09:47 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-04 09:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-24 14:11 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-23 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-07 09:51 UTCOSV refresh
  30. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-18 21:05 UTCOSV refresh
  57. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49194?
CVE-2022-49194 is a medium vulnerability published on February 26, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: bcmgenet: Use stronger register read/writes to assure ordering GCC12 appears to be much smarter about its dependency tracking and is aware that the relaxed variants are just normal loads and stores and this is causing problems…
When was CVE-2022-49194 disclosed?
CVE-2022-49194 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 26, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-49194 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49194 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 51.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49194?
CVE-2022-49194 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49194?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-49194, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-49194

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49194?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs