CVE-2022-49067

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-10-14. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

powerpc: Fix virt_addr_valid() for 64-bit Book3E & 32-bit

mpe: On 64-bit Book3E vmalloc space starts at 0x8000000000000000.

Because of the way __pa() works we have: __pa(0x8000000000000000) == 0, and therefore virt_to_pfn(0x8000000000000000) == 0, and therefore virt_addr_valid(0x8000000000000000) == true

Which is wrong, virt_addr_valid() should be false for vmalloc space. In fact all vmalloc addresses that alias with a valid PFN will return true from virt_addr_valid(). That can cause bugs with hardened usercopy as described below by Kefeng Wang:

When running ethtool eth0 on 64-bit Book3E, a BUG occurred:

usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object not in SLUB page?! (offset 0, size 1048)! kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:99 ... usercopy_abort+0x64/0xa0 (unreliable) __check_heap_object+0x168/0x190 __check_object_size+0x1a0/0x200 dev_ethtool+0x2494/0x2b20 dev_ioctl+0x5d0/0x770 sock_do_ioctl+0xf0/0x1d0 sock_ioctl+0x3ec/0x5a0 __se_sys_ioctl+0xf0/0x160 system_call_exception+0xfc/0x1f0 system_call_common+0xf8/0x200

The code shows below,

data = vzalloc(array_size(gstrings.len, ETH_GSTRING_LEN)); copy_to_user(useraddr, data, gstrings.len * ETH_GSTRING_LEN))

The data is alloced by vmalloc(), virt_addr_valid(ptr) will return true on 64-bit Book3E, which leads to the panic.

As commit 4dd7554a6456 ("powerpc/64: Add VIRTUAL_BUG_ON checks for __va and __pa addresses") does, make sure the virt addr above PAGE_OFFSET in the virt_addr_valid() for 64-bit, also add upper limit check to make sure the virt is below high_memory.

Meanwhile, for 32-bit PAGE_OFFSET is the virtual address of the start of lowmem, high_memory is the upper low virtual address, the check is suitable for 32-bit, this will fix the issue mentioned in commit 602946ec2f90 ("powerpc: Set max_mapnr correctly") too.

On 32-bit there is a similar problem with high memory, that was fixed in commit 602946ec2f90 ("powerpc: Set max_mapnr correctly"), but that commit breaks highmem and needs to be reverted.

We can't easily fix __pa(), we have code that relies on its current behaviour. So for now add extra checks to virt_addr_valid().

For 64-bit Book3S the extra checks are not necessary, the combination of virt_to_pfn() and pfn_valid() should yield the correct result, but they are harmless.

[mpe: Add additional change log detail]

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
17%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 26, 2025

Last Modified

October 14, 2025

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.4.190osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 112 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-24 14:41 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-23 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-22 23:03 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-07 10:21 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-18 21:13 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49067?
CVE-2022-49067 is a medium vulnerability published on February 26, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc: Fix virtaddrvalid() for 64-bit Book3E & 32-bit mpe: On 64-bit Book3E vmalloc space starts at 0x8000000000000000. Because of the way pa() works we have: pa(0x8000000000000000) == 0, and therefore…
When was CVE-2022-49067 disclosed?
CVE-2022-49067 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 26, 2025, with the most recent update on October 14, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-49067 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49067 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 82.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49067?
CVE-2022-49067 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49067?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-49067, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-49067

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49067?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.