CVE-2022-45786

HIGHNVD 8.18.1—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.0% (59th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.0%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

There are issues with the AGE drivers for Golang and Python that enable SQL injections to occur. This impacts AGE for PostgreSQL 11 & AGE for PostgreSQL 12, all versions up-to-and-including 1.1.0, when using those drivers.

The fix is to update to the latest Golang and Python drivers in addition to the latest version of AGE that is used for PostgreSQL 11 or  PostgreSQL 12.

The update of AGE will add a new function to enable parameterization of the cypher() function, which, in conjunction with the driver updates, will resolve this issue.

Background (for those who want more information):

After thoroughly researching this issue, we found that due to the nature of the cypher() function, it was not easy to parameterize the values passed into it. This enabled SQL injections, if the developer of the driver wasn't careful. The developer of the Golang and Pyton drivers didn't fully utilize parameterization, likely because of this, thus enabling SQL injections.

The obvious fix to this issue is to use parameterization in the drivers for all PG SQL queries. However, parameterizing all PG queries is complicated by the fact that the cypher() function call itself cannot be parameterized directly, as it isn't a real function. At least, not the parameters that would take the graph name and cypher query.

The reason the cypher() function cannot have those values parameterized is because the function is a placeholder and never actually runs. The cypher() function node, created by PG in the query tree, is transformed and replaced with a query tree for the actual cypher query during the analyze phase. The problem is that parameters - that would be passed in and that the cypher() function transform needs to be resolved - are only resolved in the execution phase, which is much later. Since the transform of the cypher() function needs to know the graph name and cypher query prior to execution, they can't be passed as parameters.

The fix that we are testing right now, and are proposing to use, is to create a function that will be called prior to the execution of the cypher() function transform. This new function will allow values to be passed as parameters for the graph name and cypher query. As this command will be executed prior to the cypher() function transform, its values will be resolved. These values can then be cached for the immediately following cypher() function transform to use. As added features, the cached values will store the calling session's pid, for validation. And, the cypher() function transform will clear this cached information after function invocation, regardless of whether it was used.

This method will allow the parameterizing of the cypher() function indirectly and provide a way to lock out SQL injection attacks.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
37
EG Risk 37/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity81% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
1.0%
EPSS %ILE
60th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

February 4, 2023

Last Modified

March 26, 2025

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Sep 13, 2026
Patch available.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/apache/age/drivers/golang—
  • every version up to 1.1.1: fixed in 1.1.1
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-age-python0.0.1, 0.0.2, 0.0.3, 0.0.4
  • every version up to 0.0.5: fixed in 0.0.5
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 27× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 174 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-10-08 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-10-01 19:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-30 16:10 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-29 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-28 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-26 15:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-16 05:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-15 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-11 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-23 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-07-22 23:02 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-45786?
CVE-2022-45786 is a high vulnerability published on February 4, 2023. There are issues with the AGE drivers for Golang and Python that enable SQL injections to occur. This impacts AGE for PostgreSQL 11 & AGE for PostgreSQL 12, all versions up-to-and-including 1.1.0, when using those drivers. The fix is to update to the latest Golang and Python drivers in addition to…
When was CVE-2022-45786 disclosed?
CVE-2022-45786 was first published on February 4, 2023, with the most recent update on March 26, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-45786 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-45786 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (60th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-45786?
CVE-2022-45786 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-45786?
A fix for CVE-2022-45786 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-45786

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-45786?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.