Improper detection of complete HTTP body decompression SwiftNIO Extras provides a pair of helpers for transparently decompressing received HTTP request or response bodies. These two objects (HTTPRequestDecompressor and HTTPResponseDecompressor) both failed to detect when the decompressed body was considered complete. If trailing junk data was appended to the HTTP message body, the code would repeatedly attempt to decompress this data and fail. This would lead to an infinite loop making no forward progress, leading to livelock of the system and denial-of-service. This issue can be triggered by any attacker capable of sending a compressed HTTP message. Most commonly this is HTTP servers, as compressed HTTP messages cannot be negotiated for HTTP requests, but it is possible that users have configured decompression for HTTP requests as well. The attack is low effort, and likely to be reached without requiring any privilege or system access. The impact on availability is high: the process immediately becomes unavailable but does not immediately crash, meaning that it is possible for the process to remain in this state until an administrator intervenes or an automated circuit breaker fires. If left unchecked this issue will very slowly exhaust memory resources due to repeated buffer allocation, but the buffers are not written to and so it is possible that the processes will not terminate for quite some time. This risk can be mitigated by removing transparent HTTP message decompression. The issue is fixed by correctly detecting the termination of the compressed body as reported by zlib and refusing to decompress further data. The issue was found by Vojtech Rylko (https://github.com/vojtarylko) and reported publicly on GitHub.
CVE-2022-3252
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.8% (55th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 39EG Risk 39/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.Exploitation1% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability30% × 15%EchelonGraph's default before algorithm v3.4: CISA had not published Automatable for this CVE.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch for a fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.8%
- EPSS %ILE
- 56th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch for a fix.
Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
Published
September 21, 2022
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
References (1)
- cve@forums · CVE Programhttps://github.com/apple/swift-nio-extras/security/advisories/GHSA-773g-x274-8qmfThird Party Advisory
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 87 of 176 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 13 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 89 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-24 11:22 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-22 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
Show 62 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-05 03:44 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-18 14:13 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-10 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-03 09:57 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-16 19:34 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-835
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2022-3252?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-3252 published?
Is CVE-2022-3252 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-3252?
How do I remediate CVE-2022-3252?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-3252
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-3252?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.