In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources.
CVE-2022-22963
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-08-25), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 99EG Risk 99/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high. - EPSS PROB
- 99.9%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 99.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-22). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.
In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://tanzu.vmware.com/security/cve-2022-22963 · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-22963
Published
April 1, 2022
Last Modified
October 30, 2025
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 23, 2026Vulnerability in Spring Cloud Function Framework Affecting Cisco Products: March 2022
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-java-spring-scf-rce-DQrHhJxHRemote code execution in Spring Cloud Function by malicious Spring Expression
https://tanzu.vmware.com/security/cve-2022-22963Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-22963(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | openshift-serverless-clients-0:1.0.1-2.el8 | 2022-04-11 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-serverless-1/kn-cli-artifacts-rhel8:1.0.1-3 | 2022-04-11 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-function-context | 1.0.0.RELEASE ... 3.1.6 (30 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(2)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 136× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 869 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 769 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-23 00:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 00:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 22:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 20:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 20:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 18:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 18:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 16:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 08:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 15:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 15:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 13:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 13:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 11:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 11:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 09:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 09:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99.9% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-13 07:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 19:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 05:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 01:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-11 21:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 13:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 08:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 04:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 00:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 20:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 16:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 12:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 08:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 04:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 23:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 19:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 15:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 11:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 07:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 03:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 23:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 18:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 14:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 10:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 06:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 02:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 22:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 18:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 13:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 09:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 05:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 01:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 17:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 13:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 09:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 04:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 00:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 20:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 08:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 04:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 00:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 19:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 15:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 11:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 03:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 23:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 19:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 15:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 10:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 06:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 02:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 22:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 18:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 14:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 10:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 06:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 01:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 21:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 17:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 13:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 09:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 05:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 01:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 21:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 16:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 12:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 08:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 04:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 00:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 20:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 16:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 11:59 UTCVendor advisory
Publicly available exploits
(15 references, 10 shown)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry, 12 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Metasploitexploit/multi/http/spring_cloud_function_spel_injection✓ verifiedPublished Mar 31, 2022
Spring Cloud Function SpEL Injection
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-51577Published Jul 11, 2023
Spring Cloud 3.2.2 - Remote Command Execution (RCE)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCJ0ey17/CVE-2022-22963_Reverse-Shell-ExploitPublished Mar 18, 2023
CVE-2022-22963 is a vulnerability in the Spring Cloud Function Framework for Java that allows remote code execution. This python script will verify if the vulnerability exists, and if it does, will give you a reverse shell.
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCcharis3306/CVE-2022-22963Published Mar 7, 2023
spring cloud function 一键利用工具! by charis 博客https://charis3306.top/
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCk3rwin/spring-cloud-function-rcePublished Apr 14, 2022
Spring Cloud Function SPEL表达式注入漏洞(CVE-2022-22963)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCtwseptian/cve-2022-22963Published Apr 3, 2022
Spring Cloud Function SpEL - cve-2022-22963
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCkh4sh3i/Spring-CVEPublished Mar 31, 2022
This includes CVE-2022-22963, a Spring SpEL / Expression Resource Access Vulnerability, as well as CVE-2022-22965, the spring-webmvc/spring-webflux RCE termed "SpringShell".
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCme2nuk/CVE-2022-22963Published Mar 31, 2022
Spring Cloud Function Vulnerable Application / CVE-2022-22963
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCdarryk10/CVE-2022-22963Published Mar 30, 2022
- GitHub PoCdinosn/CVE-2022-22963Published Mar 30, 2022
CVE-2022-22963 PoC
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
3 shownMaven:org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-function-context
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-94
- CVE-2022-22965EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-1159EG 7.7HIGH
- CVE-2022-26982EG 7.2EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2022-24780EG 8.8EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2022-26255EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-26205EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-26198EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-26272EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-22954EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-27837NVD 4.4EG 7.8HIGH
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2022-22963?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-22963 published?
Is CVE-2022-22963 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-22963?
Which products are affected by CVE-2022-22963?
How do I remediate CVE-2022-22963?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-22963
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-22963?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.