PAN-OS software provides options to exclude specific websites from URL category enforcement and those websites are blocked or allowed (depending on your rules) regardless of their associated URL category. This is done by creating a custom URL category list or by using an external dynamic list (EDL) in a URL Filtering profile. When the entries in these lists have a hostname pattern that does not end with a forward slash (/) or a hostname pattern that ends with an asterisk (*), any URL that starts with the specified pattern is considered a match. Entries with a caret (^) at the end of a hostname pattern match any top level domain. This may inadvertently allow or block more URLs than intended and allowing more URLs than intended represents a security risk. For example: example.com will match example.com.website.test example.com.* will match example.com.website.test example.com.^ will match example.com.test You should take special care when using such entries in policy rules that allow traffic. Where possible, use the exact list of hostname names ending with a forward slash (/) instead of using wildcards. PAN-OS 10.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 10.1.3; PAN-OS 10.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 10.0.8; PAN-OS 9.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.1.12; all PAN-OS 9.0 versions; PAN-OS 8.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 8.1.21, and Prisma Access 2.2 and 2.1 versions do not allow customers to change this behavior without changing the URL category list or EDL.
CVE-2022-0011
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.7% (51st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (Palo Alto Networks, Inc.) states them: "Customers with PAN-OS 9.0 are advised to apply workarounds or upgrade to PAN-OS 9.1 or a later version."
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 30EG Risk 30/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity65% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.7% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 51st
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (6.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 6.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
February 10, 2022
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
References (1)
- psirt@paloaltonetworks · CVE Programhttps://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2022-0011Mitigation · Vendor Advisory
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-0011(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 94 of 185 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 91 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-18 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-12 19:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-11 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
Show 69 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-30 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2022-0011?
When was CVE-2022-0011 made public?
Is CVE-2022-0011 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-0011?
How do I remediate CVE-2022-0011?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-0011
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-0011?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.