CVE-2021-47635

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-09-23. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2021-34669 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-5jx6-prfx-p374 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ubifs: Fix to add refcount once page is set private

MM defined the rule [1] very clearly that once page was set with PG_private flag, we should increment the refcount in that page, also main flows like pageout(), migrate_page() will assume there is one additional page reference count if page_has_private() returns true. Otherwise, we may get a BUG in page migration:

page:0000000080d05b9d refcount:-1 mapcount:0 mapping:000000005f4d82a8 index:0xe2 pfn:0x14c12 aops:ubifs_file_address_operations [ubifs] ino:8f1 dentry name:"f30e" flags: 0x1fffff80002405(locked|uptodate|owner_priv_1|private|node=0| zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page) != 0) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at include/linux/page_ref.h:184! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 3 PID: 38 Comm: kcompactd0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc5 RIP: 0010:migrate_page_move_mapping+0xac3/0xe70 Call Trace: ubifs_migrate_page+0x22/0xc0 [ubifs] move_to_new_page+0xb4/0x600 migrate_pages+0x1523/0x1cc0 compact_zone+0x8c5/0x14b0 kcompactd+0x2bc/0x560 kthread+0x18c/0x1e0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

Before the time, we should make clean a concept, what does refcount means in page gotten from grab_cache_page_write_begin(). There are 2 situations: Situation 1: refcount is 3, page is created by __page_cache_alloc. TYPE_A - the write process is using this page TYPE_B - page is assigned to one certain mapping by calling __add_to_page_cache_locked() TYPE_C - page is added into pagevec list corresponding current cpu by calling lru_cache_add() Situation 2: refcount is 2, page is gotten from the mapping's tree TYPE_B - page has been assigned to one certain mapping TYPE_A - the write process is using this page (by calling page_cache_get_speculative()) Filesystem releases one refcount by calling put_page() in xxx_write_end(), the released refcount corresponds to TYPE_A (write task is using it). If there are any processes using a page, page migration process will skip the page by judging whether expected_page_refs() equals to page refcount.

The BUG is caused by following process: PA(cpu 0) kcompactd(cpu 1) compact_zone ubifs_write_begin page_a = grab_cache_page_write_begin add_to_page_cache_lru lru_cache_add pagevec_add // put page into cpu 0's pagevec (refcnf = 3, for page creation process) ubifs_write_end SetPagePrivate(page_a) // doesn't increase page count ! unlock_page(page_a) put_page(page_a) // refcnt = 2 [...]

PB(cpu 0) filemap_read filemap_get_pages add_to_page_cache_lru lru_cache_add __pagevec_lru_add // traverse all pages in cpu 0's pagevec __pagevec_lru_add_fn SetPageLRU(page_a) isolate_migratepages isolate_migratepages_block get_page_unless_zero(page_a) // refcnt = 3 list_add(page_a, from_list) migrate_pages(from_list) __unmap_and_move move_to_new_page ubifs_migrate_page(page_a) migrate_page_move_mapping expected_page_refs get 3 (migration[1] + mapping[1] + private[1]) release_pages put_page_testzero(page_a) // refcnt = 3 page_ref_freeze // refcnt = 0 page_ref_dec_and_test(0 - 1 = -1) page_ref_unfreeze VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(-1 != 0, page)

UBIFS doesn't increase the page refcount after setting private flag, which leads to page migration task believes the page is not used by any other processes, so the page is migrated. This causes concurrent accessing on page refcount between put_page() called by other process(eg. read process calls lru_cache_add) and page_ref_unfreeze() called by mi ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
17th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 26, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (11 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.113-1: fixed in 5.10.113-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.17.3-1: fixed in 5.17.3-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.17.3-1: fixed in 5.17.3-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.17.3-1: fixed in 5.17.3-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 97 of 209 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 112 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-06 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  2. 2026-11-05 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  3. 2026-11-04 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  4. 2026-11-03 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  5. 2026-11-02 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  6. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  7. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  8. 2026-10-30 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  9. 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  10. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  11. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  12. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  13. 2026-10-25 18:18 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  15. 2026-10-24 21:39 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-24 21:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5jx6-prfx-p374 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  17. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  18. 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  19. 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  20. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  21. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  22. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  23. 2026-10-19 11:55 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  25. 2026-10-18 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  2. 2026-10-16 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  3. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  4. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  5. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  8. 2026-10-11 23:31 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  10. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  12. 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  13. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  14. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  17. 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  18. 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  19. 2026-09-30 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  21. 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  22. 2026-09-28 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  23. 2026-09-26 19:03 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  25. 2026-09-26 00:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  26. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  27. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  28. 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  29. 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  30. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  31. 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  32. 2026-09-18 19:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  33. 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  34. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  35. 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  36. 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  37. 2026-09-11 14:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  38. 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  39. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  40. 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  41. 2026-09-07 04:18 UTCOSV refresh
  42. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  43. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  44. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  45. 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  46. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  47. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  48. 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  49. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  50. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  51. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  52. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  53. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  54. 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  55. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  56. 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  57. 2026-08-20 14:31 UTCOSV refresh
  58. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  59. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  60. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  61. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  62. 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  63. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  64. 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  65. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  66. 2026-08-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  67. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  68. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  69. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  70. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  71. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  72. 2026-08-05 09:35 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-47635?
CVE-2021-47635 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 26, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ubifs: Fix to add refcount once page is set private MM defined the rule [1] very clearly that once page was set with PG_private flag, we should increment the refcount in that page, also main flows like pageout(), migrate_page()…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-47635 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2021-47635 was published on February 26, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2021-47635 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-47635 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (17th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-47635?
CVE-2021-47635 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-47635?
A fix for CVE-2021-47635 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-47635

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-47635?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.