CVE-2021-47582

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-06-19. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

USB: core: Make do_proc_control() and do_proc_bulk() killable

The USBDEVFS_CONTROL and USBDEVFS_BULK ioctls invoke usb_start_wait_urb(), which contains an uninterruptible wait with a user-specified timeout value. If timeout value is very large and the device being accessed does not respond in a reasonable amount of time, the kernel will complain about "Task X blocked for more than N seconds", as found in testing by syzbot:

INFO: task syz-executor.0:8700 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.14.0-rc7-syzkaller #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor.0 state:D stack:23192 pid: 8700 ppid: 8455 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4681 [inline] __schedule+0xc07/0x11f0 kernel/sched/core.c:5938 schedule+0x14b/0x210 kernel/sched/core.c:6017 schedule_timeout+0x98/0x2f0 kernel/time/timer.c:1857 do_wait_for_common+0x2da/0x480 kernel/sched/completion.c:85 __wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:106 [inline] wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:117 [inline] wait_for_completion_timeout+0x46/0x60 kernel/sched/completion.c:157 usb_start_wait_urb+0x167/0x550 drivers/usb/core/message.c:63 do_proc_bulk+0x978/0x1080 drivers/usb/core/devio.c:1236 proc_bulk drivers/usb/core/devio.c:1273 [inline] usbdev_do_ioctl drivers/usb/core/devio.c:2547 [inline] usbdev_ioctl+0x3441/0x6b10 drivers/usb/core/devio.c:2713 ...

To fix this problem, this patch replaces usbfs's calls to usb_control_msg() and usb_bulk_msg() with special-purpose code that does essentially the same thing (as recommended in the comment for usb_start_wait_urb()), except that it always uses a killable wait and it uses GFP_KERNEL rather than GFP_NOIO.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
9th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 19, 2024

Last Modified

September 29, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2021-47582(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.22.1.rt7.363.el8_102024-09-24redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.22.1.el8_102024-09-24redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.15.15-1: fixed in 5.15.15-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.15.15-1: fixed in 5.15.15-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.15.15-1: fixed in 5.15.15-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 95 of 193 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 5 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 98 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  2. 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  4. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  5. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  7. 2026-10-18 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  9. 2026-10-16 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  10. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  11. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  12. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  13. 2026-10-12 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  15. 2026-10-11 23:31 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  17. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  18. 2026-10-10 16:33 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  20. 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  21. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  22. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  23. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  24. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  25. 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
Show 70 more
  1. 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-09-30 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  4. 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  5. 2026-09-28 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  6. 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  7. 2026-09-26 00:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  8. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  9. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  10. 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  11. 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  12. 2026-09-21 03:49 UTCOSV refresh
  13. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  14. 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  15. 2026-09-18 19:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  16. 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  17. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  18. 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  19. 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  20. 2026-09-11 14:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  21. 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  22. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  23. 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  24. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  25. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  26. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  27. 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  28. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  29. 2026-09-02 01:40 UTCOSV refresh
  30. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  31. 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  32. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  33. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  34. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  35. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  36. 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  37. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  38. 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  39. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  40. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  41. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  42. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  43. 2026-08-16 04:13 UTCOSV refresh
  44. 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  45. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  46. 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  47. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  48. 2026-08-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  49. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  50. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  51. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  52. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  53. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  54. 2026-08-04 15:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  55. 2026-08-04 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  56. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  57. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  58. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  59. 2026-07-31 21:12 UTCOSV refresh
  60. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  61. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  62. 2026-07-28 15:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  63. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  64. 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  65. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  66. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  67. 2026-07-23 02:06 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-07-22 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  70. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-47582?
CVE-2021-47582 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 19, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: USB: core: Make doproccontrol() and doprocbulk() killable The USBDEVFSCONTROL and USBDEVFSBULK ioctls invoke usbstartwait_urb(), which contains an uninterruptible wait with a user-specified timeout value. If timeout value is very…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-47582 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2021-47582 was published on June 19, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 29, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2021-47582 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-47582 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (9th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-47582?
CVE-2021-47582 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-47582?
A fix for CVE-2021-47582 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2021-47582 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-47582

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-47582?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.