CVE-2021-47300

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-05-21. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Fix tail_call_reachable rejection for interpreter when jit failed

During testing of f263a81451c1 ("bpf: Track subprog poke descriptors correctly and fix use-after-free") under various failure conditions, for example, when jit_subprogs() fails and tries to clean up the program to be run under the interpreter, we ran into the following freeze:

[...] #127/8 tailcall_bpf2bpf_3:FAIL [...] [ 92.041251] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ___bpf_prog_run+0x1b9d/0x2e20 [ 92.042408] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88800da67f68 by task test_progs/682 [ 92.043707] [ 92.044030] CPU: 1 PID: 682 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G O 5.13.0-53301-ge6c08cb33a30-dirty #87 [ 92.045542] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 [ 92.046785] Call Trace: [ 92.047171] ? __bpf_prog_run_args64+0xc0/0xc0 [ 92.047773] ? __bpf_prog_run_args32+0x8b/0xb0 [ 92.048389] ? __bpf_prog_run_args64+0xc0/0xc0 [ 92.049019] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130 [...] // few hundred [similar] lines more [ 92.659025] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130 [ 92.659845] ? __bpf_prog_run_args64+0xc0/0xc0 [ 92.660738] ? __bpf_prog_run_args32+0x8b/0xb0 [ 92.661528] ? __bpf_prog_run_args64+0xc0/0xc0 [ 92.662378] ? print_usage_bug+0x50/0x50 [ 92.663221] ? print_usage_bug+0x50/0x50 [ 92.664077] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x9c/0xe0 [ 92.664887] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130 [ 92.665624] ? kernel_text_address+0xf5/0x100 [ 92.666529] ? __kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30 [ 92.667725] ? unwind_get_return_address+0x2f/0x50 [ 92.668854] ? ___bpf_prog_run+0x15d4/0x2e20 [ 92.670185] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130 [ 92.671130] ? __bpf_prog_run_args64+0xc0/0xc0 [ 92.672020] ? __bpf_prog_run_args32+0x8b/0xb0 [ 92.672860] ? __bpf_prog_run_args64+0xc0/0xc0 [ 92.675159] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130 [ 92.677074] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130 [ 92.678662] ? ___bpf_prog_run+0x15d4/0x2e20 [ 92.680046] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130 [ 92.681285] ? __bpf_prog_run32+0x6b/0x90 [ 92.682601] ? __bpf_prog_run64+0x90/0x90 [ 92.683636] ? lock_downgrade+0x370/0x370 [ 92.684647] ? mark_held_locks+0x44/0x90 [ 92.685652] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130 [ 92.686752] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x100 [ 92.688004] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130 [ 92.688573] ? __cant_migrate+0x2b/0x80 [ 92.689192] ? bpf_test_run+0x2f4/0x510 [ 92.689869] ? bpf_test_timer_continue+0x1c0/0x1c0 [ 92.690856] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0x90/0x90 [ 92.691506] ? __kasan_slab_alloc+0x61/0x80 [ 92.692128] ? eth_type_trans+0x128/0x240 [ 92.692737] ? __build_skb+0x46/0x50 [ 92.693252] ? bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x65e/0xc50 [ 92.693954] ? bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp+0x2d0/0x2d0 [ 92.694639] ? __fget_light+0xa1/0x100 [ 92.695162] ? bpf_prog_inc+0x23/0x30 [ 92.695685] ? __sys_bpf+0xb40/0x2c80 [ 92.696324] ? bpf_link_get_from_fd+0x90/0x90 [ 92.697150] ? mark_held_locks+0x24/0x90 [ 92.698007] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x124/0x220 [ 92.699045] ? finish_task_switch+0xe6/0x370 [ 92.700072] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x100 [ 92.701233] ? finish_task_switch+0x11d/0x370 [ 92.702264] ? __switch_to+0x2c0/0x740 [ 92.703148] ? mark_held_locks+0x24/0x90 [ 92.704155] ? __x64_sys_bpf+0x45/0x50 [ 92.705146] ? do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 [ 92.706953] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [...]

Turns out that the program rejection from e411901c0b77 ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT") is buggy since env->prog->aux->tail_call_reachable is never true. Commit ebf7d1f508a7 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT") added a tracker into check_max_stack_depth() which propagates the tail_call_reachable condition throughout the subprograms. This info is then assigned to the subprogram's ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
14%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 21, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

References (3)

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 125 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-05 09:40 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-05 09:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-04 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-04 12:12 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-04 12:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-04 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-04 09:52 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-04 09:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-01 02:42 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-28 15:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-23 02:06 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-07-22 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-18 10:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-14 09:40 UTCOSV refresh
  15. 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-07 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-28 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-26 10:37 UTCOSV refresh
  43. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-15 17:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-14 23:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-14 23:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-10 22:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-10 13:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-08 17:11 UTCOSV refresh
  70. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore

Related CVEs(same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-47300?
CVE-2021-47300 is a medium vulnerability published on May 21, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix tailcallreachable rejection for interpreter when jit failed During testing of f263a81451c1 ("bpf: Track subprog poke descriptors correctly and fix use-after-free") under various failure conditions, for example, when…
When was CVE-2021-47300 disclosed?
CVE-2021-47300 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 21, 2024, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2021-47300 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-47300 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 85.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-47300?
CVE-2021-47300 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-47300?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2021-47300, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2021-47300

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-47300?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs