CVE-2021-47094

HIGHNVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-03-04. NVD baseline CVSS 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yielding

After dropping mmu_lock in the TDP MMU, restart the iterator during tdp_iter_next() and do not advance the iterator. Advancing the iterator results in skipping the top-level SPTE and all its children, which is fatal if any of the skipped SPTEs were not visited before yielding.

When zapping all SPTEs, i.e. when min_level == root_level, restarting the iter and then invoking tdp_iter_next() is always fatal if the current gfn has as a valid SPTE, as advancing the iterator results in try_step_side() skipping the current gfn, which wasn't visited before yielding.

Sprinkle WARNs on iter->yielded being true in various helpers that are often used in conjunction with yielding, and tag the helper with __must_check to reduce the probabily of improper usage.

Failing to zap a top-level SPTE manifests in one of two ways. If a valid SPTE is skipped by both kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() and kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), the shadow page will be leaked and KVM will WARN accordingly.

WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3509 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:46 [kvm] RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu+0x3e/0x50 [kvm] Call Trace: kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x130/0x1b0 [kvm] kvm_destroy_vm+0x162/0x2a0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_release+0x34/0x60 [kvm] __fput+0x82/0x240 task_work_run+0x5c/0x90 do_exit+0x364/0xa10 ? futex_unqueue+0x38/0x60 do_group_exit+0x33/0xa0 get_signal+0x155/0x850 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xed/0x750 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xc5/0x120 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40 do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

If kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() skips a gfn/SPTE but that SPTE is then zapped by kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), KVM triggers a use-after-free in the form of marking a struct page as dirty/accessed after it has been put back on the free list. This directly triggers a WARN due to encountering a page with page_count() == 0, but it can also lead to data corruption and additional errors in the kernel.

WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1995658 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:171 RIP: 0010:kvm_is_zone_device_pfn.part.0+0x9e/0xd0 [kvm] Call Trace: kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0x120/0x1d0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x92e/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] zap_gfn_range+0x549/0x620 [kvm] kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root+0x1b6/0x270 [kvm] mmu_free_root_page+0x219/0x2c0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_free_roots+0x1b4/0x4e0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_unload+0x1c/0xa0 [kvm] kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x1f2/0x5c0 [kvm] kvm_put_kvm+0x3b1/0x8b0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_release+0x4e/0x70 [kvm] __fput+0x1f7/0x8c0 task_work_run+0xf8/0x1a0 do_exit+0x97b/0x2230 do_group_exit+0xda/0x2a0 get_signal+0x3be/0x1e50 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x244/0x17f0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xcb/0x120 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Note, the underlying bug existed even before commit 1af4a96025b3 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed") moved calls to tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() to the beginning of loops, as KVM could still incorrectly advance past a top-level entry when yielding on a lower-level entry. But with respect to leaking shadow pages, the bug was introduced by yielding before processing the current gfn.

Alternatively, tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() could simply fall through, or callers could jump to their "retry" label. The downside of that approach is that tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() _must_ be called before anything else in the loop, and there's no easy way to enfornce that requirement.

Ideally, KVM would handling the cond_resched() fully within the iterator macro (the code is actually quite clean) and avoid this entire class of bugs, but that is extremely difficult do wh ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
32
EG Risk 32/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity71% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
11th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-20). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

March 4, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 5, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

KVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yielding - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a0f64de479cae75effb630a2e0a237ca0d0623c
Web page

KVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yielding - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d884eefd75cc54887bc2e9e724207443525dfb2c

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (498 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.15.15-1: fixed in 5.15.15-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.15.15-1: fixed in 5.15.15-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.15.15-1: fixed in 5.15.15-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 97 of 202 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 105 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  2. 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  4. 2026-10-21 08:34 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-21 08:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-56c7-fm3g-6g6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  6. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  7. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  8. 2026-10-19 13:25 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  10. 2026-10-18 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  12. 2026-10-16 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  14. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  16. 2026-10-12 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-10-11 23:31 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  20. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  21. 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  23. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  24. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  25. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  2. 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  3. 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  4. 2026-09-30 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  6. 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  7. 2026-09-28 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  8. 2026-09-26 20:03 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  10. 2026-09-26 00:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  11. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  12. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  13. 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  14. 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  15. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  16. 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  17. 2026-09-18 19:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  18. 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  19. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  20. 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  21. 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  22. 2026-09-11 14:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  23. 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  24. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  25. 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  26. 2026-09-07 05:48 UTCOSV refresh
  27. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  28. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  29. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  30. 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  31. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  32. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  33. 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  34. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  35. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  36. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  37. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  38. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  39. 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  40. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  41. 2026-08-20 15:31 UTCOSV refresh
  42. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  43. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  44. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  45. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  46. 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  47. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  48. 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  49. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  50. 2026-08-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  51. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  52. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  53. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  54. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  55. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  56. 2026-08-05 09:43 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-05 09:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-56c7-fm3g-6g6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  58. 2026-08-04 15:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  59. 2026-08-04 12:21 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-04 12:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-56c7-fm3g-6g6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  61. 2026-08-04 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  62. 2026-08-04 09:53 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-04 09:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-56c7-fm3g-6g6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  64. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  65. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  66. 2026-08-01 11:06 UTCOSV refresh
  67. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  68. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  69. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  70. 2026-07-28 15:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  71. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  72. 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-47094?
CVE-2021-47094 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 4, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yielding After dropping mmu_lock in the TDP MMU, restart the iterator during tdpiternext() and do not advance the iterator. Advancing the iterator results in skipping the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-47094 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2021-47094 was published on March 4, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2021-47094 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-47094 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (11th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-47094?
CVE-2021-47094 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-47094?
A fix for CVE-2021-47094 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-47094

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-47094?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.