CVE-2021-47072

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-03-02. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: fix removed dentries still existing after log is synced

When we move one inode from one directory to another and both the inode and its previous parent directory were logged before, we are not supposed to have the dentry for the old parent if we have a power failure after the log is synced. Only the new dentry is supposed to exist.

Generally this works correctly, however there is a scenario where this is not currently working, because the old parent of the file/directory that was moved is not authoritative for a range that includes the dir index and dir item keys of the old dentry. This case is better explained with the following example and reproducer:

# The test requires a very specific layout of keys and items in the # fs/subvolume btree to trigger the bug. So we want to make sure that # on whatever platform we are, we have the same leaf/node size. # # Currently in btrfs the node/leaf size can not be smaller than the page # size (but it can be greater than the page size). So use the largest # supported node/leaf size (64K).

$ mkfs.btrfs -f -n 65536 /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt

# "testdir" is inode 257. $ mkdir /mnt/testdir $ chmod 755 /mnt/testdir

# Create several empty files to have the directory "testdir" with its # items spread over several leaves (7 in this case). $ for ((i = 1; i <= 1200; i++)); do echo -n > /mnt/testdir/file$i done

# Create our test directory "dira", inode number 1458, which gets all # its items in leaf 7. # # The BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY item for inode 257 ("testdir") that points to # the entry named "dira" is in leaf 2, while the BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY # item that points to that entry is in leaf 3. # # For this particular filesystem node size (64K), file count and file # names, we endup with the directory entry items from inode 257 in # leaves 2 and 3, as previously mentioned - what matters for triggering # the bug exercised by this test case is that those items are not placed # in leaf 1, they must be placed in a leaf different from the one # containing the inode item for inode 257. # # The corresponding BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY and BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY items for # the parent inode (257) are the following: # # item 460 key (257 DIR_ITEM 3724298081) itemoff 48344 itemsize 34 # location key (1458 INODE_ITEM 0) type DIR # transid 6 data_len 0 name_len 4 # name: dira # # and: # # item 771 key (257 DIR_INDEX 1202) itemoff 36673 itemsize 34 # location key (1458 INODE_ITEM 0) type DIR # transid 6 data_len 0 name_len 4 # name: dira

$ mkdir /mnt/testdir/dira

# Make sure everything done so far is durably persisted. $ sync

# Now do a change to inode 257 ("testdir") that does not result in # COWing leaves 2 and 3 - the leaves that contain the directory items # pointing to inode 1458 (directory "dira"). # # Changing permissions, the owner/group, updating or adding a xattr, # etc, will not change (COW) leaves 2 and 3. So for the sake of # simplicity change the permissions of inode 257, which results in # updating its inode item and therefore change (COW) only leaf 1.

$ chmod 700 /mnt/testdir

# Now fsync directory inode 257. # # Since only the first leaf was changed/COWed, we log the inode item of # inode 257 and only the dentries found in the first leaf, all have a # key type of BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY, and no keys of type # BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY, because they sort after the former type and none # exist in the first leaf. # # We also log 3 items that represent ranges for dir items and dir # indexes for which the log is authoritative: # # 1) a key of type BTRFS_DIR_LOG_ITEM_KEY, which indicates the log is # authoritative for all BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY keys that have an offset # in the range [0, 2285968570] (the offset here is th ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
8th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

March 1, 2024

Last Modified

January 9, 2025

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 94 of 176 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 82 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  4. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  5. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  7. 2026-10-18 08:50 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  9. 2026-10-16 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  10. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  11. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  12. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  13. 2026-10-12 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  15. 2026-10-11 23:31 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  17. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  18. 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  19. 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  20. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  21. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  22. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  23. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  24. 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  25. 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-09-30 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  4. 2026-09-28 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  5. 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  6. 2026-09-26 00:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  7. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  8. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  9. 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  10. 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  11. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  12. 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  13. 2026-09-18 19:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  14. 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  15. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  16. 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  17. 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  18. 2026-09-11 14:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  19. 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  20. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  21. 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  22. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  23. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  24. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  25. 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  26. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  27. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  28. 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  29. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  30. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  31. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  32. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  33. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  34. 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  35. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  36. 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  37. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  38. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  39. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  40. 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  41. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  42. 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  43. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  44. 2026-08-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  45. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  46. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  47. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  48. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  49. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  50. 2026-08-04 15:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  51. 2026-08-04 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  52. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  53. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  54. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  55. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  56. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  57. 2026-07-28 15:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  58. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  59. 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  60. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  61. 2026-07-23 02:06 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-07-22 22:52 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  64. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  65. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  66. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  67. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  68. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  69. 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-47072?
CVE-2021-47072 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 1, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix removed dentries still existing after log is synced When we move one inode from one directory to another and both the inode and its previous parent directory were logged before, we are not supposed to have the dentry for…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-47072 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2021-47072 was published on March 1, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of January 9, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2021-47072 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-47072 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-47072?
CVE-2021-47072 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-47072?
A fix for CVE-2021-47072 is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but EchelonGraph has no release containing it on record. Check that reference and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains the fix and update to it; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2021-47072

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-47072?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.