EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
- •Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed
A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mt76: mt7921: fix possible invalid register access
Disable the interrupt and synchronze for the pending irq handlers to ensure
the irq tasklet is not being scheduled after the suspend to avoid the
possible invalid register access acts when the host pcie controller is
suspended.
[17932.910534] mt7921e 0000:01:00.0: pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x22c returned 0 after 21375 usecs
[17932.910590] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: calling pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x22c @ 18565, parent: pci0000:00
[17932.910602] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x22c returned 0 after 8 usecs
[17932.910671] mtk-pcie 11230000.pcie: calling platform_pm_suspend+0x0/0x60 @ 22783, parent: soc
[17932.910674] mtk-pcie 11230000.pcie: platform_pm_suspend+0x0/0x60 returned 0 after 0 usecs
...
17933.615352] x1 : 00000000000d4200 x0 : ffffff8269ca2300
[17933.620666] Call trace:
[17933.623127] mt76_mmio_rr+0x28/0xf0 [mt76]
[17933.627234] mt7921_rr+0x38/0x44 [mt7921e]
[17933.631339] mt7921_irq_tasklet+0x54/0x1d8 [mt7921e]
[17933.636309] tasklet_action_common+0x12c/0x16c
[17933.640754] tasklet_action+0x24/0x2c
[17933.644418] __do_softirq+0x16c/0x344
[17933.648082] irq_exit+0xa8/0xac
[17933.651224] scheduler_ipi+0xd4/0x148
[17933.654890] handle_IPI+0x164/0x2d4
[17933.658379] gic_handle_irq+0x140/0x178
[17933.662216] el1_irq+0xb8/0x180
[17933.665361] cpuidle_enter_state+0xf8/0x204
[17933.669544] cpuidle_enter+0x38/0x4c
[17933.673122] do_idle+0x1a4/0x2a8
[17933.676352] cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x28
[17933.680276] rest_init+0xd4/0xe0
[17933.683508] arch_call_rest_init+0x10/0x18
[17933.687606] start_kernel+0x340/0x3b4
[17933.691279] Code: aa0003f5 d503201f f953eaa8 8b344108 (b9400113)
[17933.697373] ---[ end trace a24b8e26ffbda3c5 ]---
[17933.767846] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it