Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by a buffer overflow by an authenticated user. This affects D6220 before 1.0.0.68, D6400 before 1.0.0.102, D7000v2 before 1.0.0.66, D8500 before 1.0.3.58, DC112A before 1.0.0.54, EX7000 before 1.0.1.94, EX7500 before 1.0.0.72, R6250 before 1.0.4.48, R6300v2 before 1.0.4.52, R6400 before 1.0.1.70, R6400v2 before 1.0.4.102, R6700v3 before 1.0.4.102, R7000 before 1.0.11.116, R7100LG before 1.0.0.64, R7850 before 1.0.5.68, R7900 before 1.0.4.30, R7960P before 1.4.1.68, R8000 before 1.0.4.52, RAX200 before 1.0.2.88, RBS40V before 2.6.2.4, RS400 before 1.5.1.80, XR300 before 1.0.3.56, R7000P before 1.3.2.124, R8000P before 1.4.1.68, R8500 before 1.0.2.144, RAX80 before 1.0.3.102, R6900P before 1.3.2.124, R7900P before 1.4.1.68, R8300 before 1.0.2.144, RAX75 before 1.0.3.102, RBR750 before 3.2.17.12, RBR850 before 3.2.17.12, RBS750 before 3.2.17.12, RBS850 before 3.2.17.12, RBK752 before 3.2.17.12, and RBK852 before 3.2.17.12.
CVE-2021-45527
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.6 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.2% (67th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).
- CVSS v3
- 9.6
- EG Score
- 9.6CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 44EG Risk 44/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity96% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.6 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation1.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. - EPSS PROB
- 1.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 67th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.6): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.6 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.6 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 1.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-23). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
December 26, 2021
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Oct 2, 2026Security Advisory for Post-Authentication Buffer Overflow on Some Routers, Extenders, and WiFi Systems, PSV-2020-0437 - NETGEAR Support
https://kb.netgear.com/000064493/Security-Advisory-for-Post-Authentication-Buffer-Overflow-on-Some-Routers-Extenders-and-WiFi-Systems-PSV-2020-0437Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 56× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 96 of 209 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 113 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-23 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 18:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h529-hgpf-hm97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-22 20:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 20:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h529-hgpf-hm97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-21 22:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 22:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h529-hgpf-hm97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-21 00:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 00:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h529-hgpf-hm97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-20 02:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 02:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h529-hgpf-hm97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-19 03:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 03:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h529-hgpf-hm97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 05:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h529-hgpf-hm97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-17 07:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 07:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h529-hgpf-hm97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-16 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-16 08:42 UTCEG score recompute
Show 71 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-16 08:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h529-hgpf-hm97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-15 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 07:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h529-hgpf-hm97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-14 03:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 03:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h529-hgpf-hm97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-12 23:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h529-hgpf-hm97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-12 19:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-11 23:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-01 03:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2021-45527?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-45527 published?
Is CVE-2021-45527 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-45527?
How do I remediate CVE-2021-45527?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2021-45527
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-45527?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.