CVE-2021-41129

HIGHNVD 8.18.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.7%, top 25% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
8.1
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 2%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Pterodactyl is an open-source game server management panel built with PHP 7, React, and Go. A malicious user can modify the contents of a confirmation_token input during the two-factor authentication process to reference a cache value not associated with the login attempt. In rare cases this can allow a malicious actor to authenticate as a random user in the Panel. The malicious user must target an account with two-factor authentication enabled, and then must provide a correct two-factor authentication token before being authenticated as that user. Due to a validation flaw in the logic handling user authentication during the two-factor authentication process a malicious user can trick the system into loading credentials for an arbitrary user by modifying the token sent to the server. This authentication flaw is present in the LoginCheckpointController@__invoke method which handles two-factor authentication for a user. This controller looks for a request input parameter called confirmation_token which is expected to be a 64 character random alpha-numeric string that references a value within the Panel's cache containing a user_id value. This value is then used to fetch the user that attempted to login, and lookup their two-factor authentication token. Due to the design of this system, any element in the cache that contains only digits could be referenced by a malicious user, and whatever value is stored at that position would be used as the user_id. There are a few different areas of the Panel that store values into the cache that are integers, and a user who determines what those cache keys are could pass one of those keys which would cause this code pathway to reference an arbitrary user. At its heart this is a high-risk login bypass vulnerability. However, there are a few additional conditions that must be met in order for this to be successfully executed, notably: 1.) The account referenced by the malicious cache key must have two-factor authentication enabled. An account without two-factor authentication would cause an exception to be triggered by the authentication logic, thusly exiting this authentication flow. 2.) Even if the malicious user is able to reference a valid cache key that references a valid user account with two-factor authentication, they must provide a valid two-factor authentication token. However, due to the design of this endpoint once a valid user account is found with two-factor authentication enabled there is no rate-limiting present, thusly allowing an attacker to brute force combinations until successful. This leads to a third condition that must be met: 3.) For the duration of this attack sequence the cache key being referenced must continue to exist with a valid user_id value. Depending on the specific key being used for this attack, this value may disappear quickly, or be changed by other random user interactions on the Panel, outside the control of the attacker. In order to mitigate this vulnerability the underlying authentication logic was changed to use an encrypted session store that the user is therefore unable to control the value of. This completely removed the use of a user-controlled value being used. In addition, the code was audited to ensure this type of vulnerability is not present elsewhere.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1(medium)
EG Risk
EPSS
74.7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

October 6, 2021

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
pterodactyl/panelv1.0.0 ... v1.6.1 (21 versions)1.6.2

Weakness Classification(4)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 104 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-22 22:50 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-18 10:29 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-07-18 10:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-18 10:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-07 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-02 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-30 11:00 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-15 17:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-14 23:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-14 23:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-12 19:40 UTCOSV refresh
  44. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-10 22:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-10 22:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-10 13:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-29 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-26 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-26 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-26 09:23 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-41129?
CVE-2021-41129 is a high vulnerability published on October 6, 2021. Pterodactyl is an open-source game server management panel built with PHP 7, React, and Go. A malicious user can modify the contents of a confirmationtoken input during the two-factor authentication process to reference a cache value not associated with the login attempt. In rare cases this can…
When was CVE-2021-41129 disclosed?
CVE-2021-41129 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on October 6, 2021, with the most recent update on November 21, 2024. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2021-41129 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-41129 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 74.7% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-41129?
CVE-2021-41129 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-41129?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2021-41129, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-41129

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-41129?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.