CVE-2021-41129

HIGHNVD 8.18.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.8% (77th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.8%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Pterodactyl is an open-source game server management panel built with PHP 7, React, and Go. A malicious user can modify the contents of a confirmation_token input during the two-factor authentication process to reference a cache value not associated with the login attempt. In rare cases this can allow a malicious actor to authenticate as a random user in the Panel. The malicious user must target an account with two-factor authentication enabled, and then must provide a correct two-factor authentication token before being authenticated as that user. Due to a validation flaw in the logic handling user authentication during the two-factor authentication process a malicious user can trick the system into loading credentials for an arbitrary user by modifying the token sent to the server. This authentication flaw is present in the LoginCheckpointController@__invoke method which handles two-factor authentication for a user. This controller looks for a request input parameter called confirmation_token which is expected to be a 64 character random alpha-numeric string that references a value within the Panel's cache containing a user_id value. This value is then used to fetch the user that attempted to login, and lookup their two-factor authentication token. Due to the design of this system, any element in the cache that contains only digits could be referenced by a malicious user, and whatever value is stored at that position would be used as the user_id. There are a few different areas of the Panel that store values into the cache that are integers, and a user who determines what those cache keys are could pass one of those keys which would cause this code pathway to reference an arbitrary user. At its heart this is a high-risk login bypass vulnerability. However, there are a few additional conditions that must be met in order for this to be successfully executed, notably: 1.) The account referenced by the malicious cache key must have two-factor authentication enabled. An account without two-factor authentication would cause an exception to be triggered by the authentication logic, thusly exiting this authentication flow. 2.) Even if the malicious user is able to reference a valid cache key that references a valid user account with two-factor authentication, they must provide a valid two-factor authentication token. However, due to the design of this endpoint once a valid user account is found with two-factor authentication enabled there is no rate-limiting present, thusly allowing an attacker to brute force combinations until successful. This leads to a third condition that must be met: 3.) For the duration of this attack sequence the cache key being referenced must continue to exist with a valid user_id value. Depending on the specific key being used for this attack, this value may disappear quickly, or be changed by other random user interactions on the Panel, outside the control of the attacker. In order to mitigate this vulnerability the underlying authentication logic was changed to use an encrypted session store that the user is therefore unable to control the value of. This completely removed the use of a user-controlled value being used. In addition, the code was audited to ensure this type of vulnerability is not present elsewhere.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
37
EG Risk 37/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity81% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.8% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
1.8%
EPSS %ILE
77th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
1.8% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-20). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 6, 2021

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 17, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Authentication bypass due to improper user-provided security token verification · Advisory · pterodactyl/panel · GitHub

https://github.com/pterodactyl/panel/security/advisories/GHSA-5vfx-8w6m-h3v4
GitHub release Patch Available

v1.6.2

Patch available: pterodactyl/panel v1.6.2

https://github.com/pterodactyl/panel/releases/tag/v1.6.2
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 4a84c36009be (pterodactyl/panel)

Patch available: pterodactyl/panel v1.9.2 (contains commit 4a84c36009be)

https://github.com/pterodactyl/panel/commit/4a84c36009be10dbd83051ac1771662c056e4977
Web page

panel/CHANGELOG.md at v1.6.2 · pterodactyl/panel · GitHub

https://github.com/pterodactyl/panel/blob/v1.6.2/CHANGELOG.md#v162

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
pterodactyl/panelv1.0.0 ... v1.6.1 (21 versions)
  • 1.0.0 up to 1.6.2: fixed in 1.6.2
—

Weakness Classification(4)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 95 of 200 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 5 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 105 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  2. 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  4. 2026-10-21 09:00 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  6. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  7. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  8. 2026-10-18 08:54 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-17 20:25 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  11. 2026-10-16 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  12. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  13. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  14. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  15. 2026-10-12 19:10 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  17. 2026-10-11 23:35 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  19. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  20. 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  21. 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  22. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  23. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  24. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  25. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
Show 70 more
  1. 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  2. 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  3. 2026-10-01 19:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  4. 2026-09-30 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 77th percentile
  6. 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  7. 2026-09-28 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  8. 2026-09-27 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  9. 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  10. 2026-09-26 00:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  11. 2026-09-25 14:45 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  13. 2026-09-23 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  14. 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  15. 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  16. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  17. 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  18. 2026-09-18 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  19. 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  20. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  21. 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  22. 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  23. 2026-09-11 14:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  24. 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  25. 2026-09-08 21:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  26. 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  27. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  28. 2026-09-06 05:52 UTCOSV refresh
  29. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  30. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  31. 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  32. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  33. 2026-09-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  34. 2026-09-01 03:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  35. 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  36. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  37. 2026-08-28 21:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  38. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  39. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  40. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  41. 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  42. 2026-08-23 00:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  43. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  44. 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  45. 2026-08-19 17:26 UTCOSV refresh
  46. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 76th percentile
  47. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  48. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  49. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  50. 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  51. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  52. 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  53. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  54. 2026-08-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  55. 2026-08-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  56. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  57. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  58. 2026-08-05 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  59. 2026-08-04 12:57 UTCOSV refresh
  60. 2026-08-04 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  61. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  62. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  63. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  64. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.8% · 75th percentile
  65. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 74th percentile
  66. 2026-07-28 15:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 74th percentile
  67. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 74th percentile
  68. 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 74th percentile
  69. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 74th percentile
  70. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 74th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-41129?
CVE-2021-41129 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 6, 2021. Pterodactyl is an open-source game server management panel built with PHP 7, React, and Go. A malicious user can modify the contents of a confirmationtoken input during the two-factor authentication process to reference a cache value not associated with the login attempt. In rare cases this can…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-41129 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2021-41129 was published on October 6, 2021. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2021-41129 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-41129 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.8% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (77th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-41129?
CVE-2021-41129 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-41129?
A fix for CVE-2021-41129 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-41129

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-41129?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.