The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).
CVE-2021-3450
This high-severity CVE scores 7.4 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 18% (97th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.4
- EG Score
- 7.4HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 64EG Risk 64/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity74% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 18%
- EPSS %ILE
- 97th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
March 25, 2021
Last Modified
October 8, 2026
Advisory Details (7)
Auto-updated Oct 8, 2026OpenSSL Security Advisory
https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/2021-March/000198.html[SECURITY] Fedora 34 Update: openssl-1.1.1k-1.fc34 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CCBFLLVQVILIVGZMBJL3IXZGKWQISYNP/oss-security - Re: OpenSSL 1.1.1 CVE-2021-3450 CA certificate check bypass with X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT, CVE-2021-3449 NULL pointer deref in signature_algorithms processing
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4oss-security - Re: OpenSSL 1.1.1 CVE-2021-3450 CA certificate check bypass with X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT, CVE-2021-3449 NULL pointer deref in signature_algorithms processing
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3oss-security - Re: OpenSSL 1.1.1 CVE-2021-3450 CA certificate check bypass with X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT, CVE-2021-3449 NULL pointer deref in signature_algorithms processing
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2oss-security - OpenSSL 1.1.1 CVE-2021-3450 CA certificate check bypass with X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT, CVE-2021-3449 NULL pointer deref in signature_algorithms processing
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1Vendor Advisories for CVE-2021-3450(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(7)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | jbcs-httpd24-openssl-pkcs11-0:0.4.10-20.jbcs.el7 | 2021-04-14 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl | 2021-04-14 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat-native-0:1.2.23-24.redhat_24.ep7.el7 | 2021-04-14 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2021-04-14 | redhat |
| redhat | jws5-tomcat-native-0:1.2.25-4.redhat_4.el8jws | 2021-04-14 | redhat |
| redhat | redhat-virtualization-host-0:4.4.5-20210330.0.el8_3 | 2021-04-14 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.1.1g-15.el8_3 | 2021-03-30 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(23 across 21 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.15(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
| openssl3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.16(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
| openssl3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.10(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.17(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.18(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.19(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.20(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.21(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.22(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.23(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.24(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.9(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
crates.io(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl-src | — |
| — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(8)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2021:1024IMPORTANT2021-03-25
RHSA-2021:1024 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:1189IMPORTANT2021-03-25
RHSA-2021:1189 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:1195IMPORTANT2021-03-25
RHSA-2021:1195 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:1196IMPORTANT2021-03-25
RHSA-2021:1196 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:1199IMPORTANT2021-03-25
RHSA-2021:1199 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:1200IMPORTANT2021-03-25
RHSA-2021:1200 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:1202IMPORTANT2021-03-25
RHSA-2021:1202 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:1203IMPORTANT2021-03-25
RHSA-2021:1203 — Important
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 31× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 175 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-08 21:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 19:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 15:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 05:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-26 00:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-23 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 19:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 14:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 21:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 20:13 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 03:33 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 21:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-23 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 06:15 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 19:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 01:40 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-28 15:33 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 02:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 23:29 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-18 10:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescore
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownAlpine:v3.10:openssl
- CVE-2021-23840NVD 7.5EG 8.1EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2020-1967NVD 7.5EG 8.1EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2021-3449NVD 5.9EG 7.8EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2021-23841EG 5.9EPSS p94MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-1543EG 7.4EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2020-1971EG 5.9EPSS p94MEDIUM
- CVE-2018-0734EG 5.9EPSS p96MEDIUM
- CVE-2018-0735EG 5.9EPSS p92MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-1551EG 5.3EPSS p97MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-1549EG 5.3EPSS p93MEDIUM
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2021-3450?
When was CVE-2021-3450 disclosed?
Is CVE-2021-3450 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-3450?
How do I remediate CVE-2021-3450?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-3450
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-3450?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.